Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35165288›Full record

ArticleScientific data2022

Organic materials repurposing, a data set for theoretical predictions of new applications for existing compounds.

Ömer H Omar, Tahereh Nematiaram, Alessandro Troisi, Daniele Padula

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Predicting SJournal of chemical theory and computation · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Virtual Screening for Organic Solar Cells and Light Emitting Diodes.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ömer H OmarUniversity of Liverpool, Department of Chemistry, Liverpool, L69 7ZD, UK.
Tahereh NematiaramUniversity of Liverpool, Department of Chemistry, Liverpool, L69 7ZD, UK.
Alessandro TroisiUniversity of Liverpool, Department of Chemistry, Liverpool, L69 7ZD, UK. a.troisi@liverpool.ac.uk.
Daniele PadulaUniversità di Siena, Dipartimento di Biotecnologie, Chimica e Farmacia, Siena, 53100, Italy. daniele.padula@unisi.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7171-7928

Funding

Ministero dell'Istruzione, dell'Università e della Ricerca (Ministry of Education, University and Research) Rita Levi Montalcini grant
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present a data set of 48182 organic semiconductors, constituted of molecules that were prepared with a documented synthetic pathway and are stable in solid state. We based our search on the Cambridge Structural Database, from which we selected semiconductors with a computational funnel procedure. For each entry we provide a set of electronic properties relevant for organic materials research, and the electronic wavefunction for further calculations and/or analyses. This data set has low bias because it was not built from a set of materials designed for organic electronics, and thus it provides an excellent starting point in the search of new applications for known materials, with a great potential for novel physical insight. The data set contains molecules used as benchmarks in many fields of organic materials research, allowing to test the reliability of computational screenings for the desired application, "rediscovering" well-known molecules. This is demonstrated by a series of different applications in the field of organic materials, confirming the potential for the repurposing of known organic molecules.

Identifiers

PMID35165288
PMCPMC8844419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.