SynthesisBMJ open2022
Definitions and measurement of health literacy in health and medicine research: a systematic review.
Synthesis in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
65 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Examining the relationship between health literacy and eHealth literacy in adult populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Health promotion international · 2025Pooled it
- An update on health literacy dimensions: An umbrella review.PloS one · 2025Pooled it
- eHealth literacy among hospital health care providers: a systematic review.BMC health services research · 2023Pooled it
- Effects of Health Literacy Promotion Programs for Preventing Opisthorchiasis and Cholangiocarcinoma: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2023Pooled it
- Effectiveness of health literacy interventions on anxious and depressive symptomatology in primary health care: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2023Pooled it
- The impact of educational intervention on enhancing the health literacy among middle-aged individuals at risk for cardiovascular diseases: a randomized cotrolled trial.BMC public health · 2025Trial
- Impact of educational pamphlet in achalasia care: education as therapy among Pakistani patients.Esophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society · 2026Article
- Self-Reported Health Literacy and Current Conventional Cigarette Smoking Among Korean Adults: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of the 2024 Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
- Development and validation of a rapid health literacy assessment tool for Chinese primary and secondary school students.Health promotion international · 2026Article
- The parents voice on oral health care from two paediatric oncology units.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2026Observational
- Comment on 'The Association Between Self-Care and Health Literacy in Patients With Chronic Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis'.Journal of clinical nursing · 2026Article
- Health Literacy, Social Support and Quality of Life in Chinese Health Examination Population.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Consequences of genomic literacy elements on genetic testing decisions among Emirati adults: a cross-sectional study.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- The Relationship between Health Literacy, Nutrition Literacy, and Food Literacy and Dietary Behaviors in Adults: A Systematic Review.Nutrition reviews · 2026Article
- Association Between Health Literacy and Prehypertension in South Korean Adults: Cross-Sectional Study Using the 2023 Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.JMIR public health and surveillance · 2026Article
- Validation of a health literacy assessment tool in a nationwide population: a measurement invariance study using confirmatory factor analysis and multiple-group latent class analysis.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Exploring the factors associated with health literacy among adolescents in Hong Kong.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Reconceptualizing Health Literacy to End Confusions: An Umbrella Review Research.Health science reports · 2026Review
- Health literacy and attitudes toward clinical AI: a cross-sectional study in Istanbul.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe way health literacy is understood (conceptualised) should be closely linked to how it is measured (operationalised). This study aimed to gain insights into how health literacy is defined and measured in current health literacy research and to examine the relationship between health literacy definitions and instruments.
designSystematic review in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. DATA SOURCES: The MEDLINE, PsycINFO, ERIC and CINAHL databases were searched for articles published during two randomly selected months (March and October) in 2019. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We included articles with a quantitative design that measured health literacy, were peer-reviewed and original, were published in the English language and included a study population older than 16 years. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Six researchers screened the articles for eligibility and extracted the data independently. All health literacy definitions and instruments were considered in relation to category 1 (describing basic reading and writing skills, disease-specific knowledge and practical skills) and category 2 (social health literacy competence and the ability to interpret and critically assess health information). The categories were inspired by Nutbeam's descriptions of the different health literacy levels.
results120 articles were included in the review: 60 within public health and 60 within clinical health. The majority of the articles (n=77) used instruments from category 1. In total, 79 of the studies provided a health literacy definition; of these, 71 were in category 2 and 8 were in category 1. In almost half of the studies (n=38), health literacy was defined in a broad perspective (category 2) but measured with a more narrow focus (category 1).
conclusionDue to the high degree of inconsistency between health literacy definitions and instruments in current health literacy research, there is a risk of missing important information about health literacy considered be important to the initial understanding of the concept recognised in the studies. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020179699.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.