Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35165100›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2022

Tumor Drug Concentration and Phosphoproteomic Profiles After Two Weeks of Treatment With Sunitinib in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma.

Myra E van Linde, Mariette Labots, Cyrillo G Brahm, Koos E Hovinga, Philip C De Witt Hamer, Richard J Honeywell, Richard de Goeij-de Haas, Alex A Henneman, Jaco C Knol, Godefridus J Peters and 6 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Myra E van LindeDepartment of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Mariette LabotsDepartment of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Cyrillo G BrahmDepartment of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Koos E HovingaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Philip C De Witt HamerDepartment of Neurosurgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2988-8544
Richard J HoneywellDepartment of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9415-5959
Richard de Goeij-de HaasDepartment of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Alex A HennemanDepartment of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3746-4410
Jaco C KnolDepartment of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Godefridus J PetersDepartment of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5447-2877
Henk DekkerDepartment of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6228-8319
Sander R PiersmaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Thang V PhamDepartment of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0333-2492
William P VandertopDepartment of Neurosurgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5417-0265
Connie R JiménezDepartment of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3103-4508
Henk M W VerheulDepartment of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5981-922X
Amsterdam Neuroscience · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) have poor efficacy in patients with glioblastoma (GBM). Here, we studied whether this is predominantly due to restricted blood-brain barrier penetration or more to biological characteristics of GBM. PATIENTS AND

methodsTumor drug concentrations of the TKI sunitinib after 2 weeks of preoperative treatment was determined in 5 patients with GBM and compared with its in vitro inhibitory concentration (IC50) in GBM cell lines. In addition, phosphotyrosine (pTyr)-directed mass spectrometry (MS)-based proteomics was performed to evaluate sunitinib-treated versus control GBM tumors.

resultsThe median tumor sunitinib concentration of 1.9 μmol/L (range 1.0-3.4) was 10-fold higher than in concurrent plasma, but three times lower than sunitinib IC50s in GBM cell lines (median 5.4 μmol/L, 3.0-8.5; P = 0.01). pTyr-phosphoproteomic profiles of tumor samples from 4 sunitinib-treated versus 7 control patients revealed 108 significantly up- and 23 downregulated (P < 0.05) phosphopeptides for sunitinib treatment, resulting in an EGFR-centered signaling network. Outlier analysis of kinase activities as a potential strategy to identify drug targets in individual tumors identified nine kinases, including MAPK10 and INSR/IGF1R.

conclusionsAchieved tumor sunitinib concentrations in patients with GBM are higher than in plasma, but lower than reported for other tumor types and insufficient to significantly inhibit tumor cell growth in vitro. Therefore, alternative TKI dosing to increase intratumoral sunitinib concentrations might improve clinical benefit for patients with GBM. In parallel, a complex profile of kinase activity in GBM was found, supporting the potential of (phospho)proteomic analysis for the identification of targets for (combination) treatment.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGlioblastomaCell Line, TumorHumansIndolesProteomicsPyrrolesSunitinibIndolesPyrrolesSunitinib

Identifiers

PMID35165100
PMCPMC9365363
OpenAlexW4213233384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.