Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35165000›Full record

ArticleJournal of substance abuse treatment2022

Predictors and outcomes of online mutual-help group attendance in a national survey study.

Christine Timko, Amy Mericle, Lee Ann Kaskutas, Priscilla Martinez, Sarah E Zemore

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of substance abuse treatment, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Christine TimkoCenter for Innovation to Implementation, VA Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, USA; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA. Electronic address: ctimko@stanford.edu.
Amy MericleAlcohol Research Group, Emeryville, CA, USA.
Lee Ann KaskutasAlcohol Research Group, Emeryville, CA, USA.
Priscilla MartinezAlcohol Research Group, Emeryville, CA, USA.
Sarah E ZemoreAlcohol Research Group, Emeryville, CA, USA.
Alcohol Research Group · USCenter for Innovation · US

Funding

Mutual Help Alternatives for Alcohol Problems: Benefits and Causal MechanismsR01AA027920 · NIAAA · PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE · PI ZEMORE, SARAH E. · 2020 to 2023
$1.4M
12-step Alternatives and Recovery Outcomes in a Large National StudyR21AA022747 · NIAAA · PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE · PI ZEMORE, SARAH E. · 2014 to 2015
$398k
HSRD VA RCS 00-001NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA027920NIAAA NIH HHS R21 AA022747
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDuring the COVID-19 pandemic, online video platforms became the primary mode of accessing substance use-focused mutual-help group meetings, which may persist after in-person meetings are available again. This study examined the characteristics (demographic, substance use and recovery, and mutual-help group use) of attendees of online recovery support meetings, and associations of online meeting attendance with substance use outcomes, using national data (without ensured representativeness) collected before the pandemic.

methodsData were from the Peer Alternatives in Addiction (PAL) Study of attendees of 12-step groups (e.g., Alcoholics Anonymous), Women for Sobriety (WFS), LifeRing Secular Recovery (LifeRing), and SMART Recovery (SMART). The baseline sample, collected in 2015 (pre-pandemic), was 647 adults with lifetime alcohol use disorder who were surveyed online at baseline and 6-month (81%) and 12-month follow-up (83%).

resultsAt baseline, 62% (n = 402) had attended an online mutual-help group meeting in their lifetime, and 36% (n = 236) had done so in the past 30 days. Bivariate analyses found that online meeting attendance was more likely among women than men, younger than older participants, and participants with more recent alcohol and drug use, and less abstinence self-efficacy. In addition, online meeting attendance was more likely among respondents who attended two or more different types of mutual-help groups (rather than just one type), and whose primary group was 12-step or WFS rather than LifeRing or SMART. Longitudinal analyses found an interaction between online meeting attendance (yes or no) and time on the outcomes of alcohol and total abstinence such that, compared to those who did not attend online meetings, online meeting attendees were less likely to be abstinent at baseline but were about the same on abstinence at 12 months. However, the interaction effect was attenuated when the model adjusted for mutual-help use characteristics.

conclusionsThe findings inform mutual-help groups, providers, and researchers' efforts to sustain and expand this resource by suggesting that online meeting attendance may have appeal and be helpful to mutual-help group members who are earlier in their recovery.

Indexed as

AlcoholismCOVID-19Substance-Related DisordersAdultAlcoholics AnonymousFemaleHumansMalePandemicsSelf-Help GroupsAlcohol use disorderMutual-help groupsOnline recovery resources

Identifiers

PMID35165000
PMCPMC9167158
OpenAlexW4210878012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.