Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35164884›Full record

ReviewKnee surgery & related research2022

Is the patient aware of the difference between resurfaced and nonresurfaced patella after bilateral total knee arthroplasty? A systematic review of simultaneous bilateral randomized trials.

Keun Young Choi, Yong In, Man Soo Kim, Sueen Sohn, In Jun Koh

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Knee surgery & related research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Should we replace the patella during total knee replacement?Joint diseases and related surgery · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Keun Young ChoiJoint Replacement Center, Eunpyeong St. Mary's Hospital, 1021, Tongil-ro, Eunpyeong-gu, Seoul, 03312, Republic of Korea.
Yong InDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, Seoul, 06591, Republic of Korea.
Man Soo KimDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, Seoul, 06591, Republic of Korea.
Sueen SohnDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Inje University Sanggye Paik Hospital, College of Medicine, Inje University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
In Jun KohJoint Replacement Center, Eunpyeong St. Mary's Hospital, 1021, Tongil-ro, Eunpyeong-gu, Seoul, 03312, Republic of Korea. esmh.jrcenter@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7941-1587
Eunpyeong Hospital · KRThe Catholic University of Korea Seoul St. Mary's Hospital · KRInje University Sanggye Paik Hospital · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe optimal practice of patellar management in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains controversial. This systematic review was conducted to compare patella-related (1) patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), (2) clinical outcomes, and (3) reoperation rates after TKA with patellar resurfacing (PR) and nonresurfacing (NPR) in single patients undergoing bilateral patellar procedures during simultaneous bilateral TKA.

methodsThis review included prospective bilateral randomized trials investigating patella-related PROMs, clinical outcomes, and reoperation (secondary resurfacing and patellar component revision) and other patella-related complications in single patients undergoing randomly assigned PR and NPR during bilateral TKA.

resultsSix studies were included. There was no difference in PROMs between PR and NPR in five studies, whereas PR was found to be superior to NPR in one study. Five studies reported similar functional outcomes and complication rates between PR and NPR, while one study found better clinical outcomes and a lower complication rate in PR. Between-group secondary resurfacing and patellar revision rates were similar in all studies.

conclusionsThe majority of patients who underwent bilateral patellar procedures could not tell the difference between PR and NPR following bilateral TKA. There were no differences in clinical outcomes or reoperation and complication rates between PR and NPR. No evidence was found to support routine PR. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level 1.

Indexed as

BilateralPatellaPatellar resurfacingTotal knee arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID35164884
PMCPMC8842956
OpenAlexW4212841826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.