Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35164836›Full record

Trial reportTrials2022

Improvement of participation rate in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening by training general practitioners in motivational interviewing (AmDepCCR).

Paul Aujoulat, Delphine Le Goff, Antoine Dany, Michel Robaskiewick, Jean Baptiste Nousbaum, Jeremy Derrienic, Mélanie Cariou, Morgane Guillou, Jean Yves Le Reste

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04492215 (Improving the Participation Rate in ColoRectal Cancer Screening by Training General Practitioners in Motivational Interviewing), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04492215 naunknown statusnot on this map

Improving the Participation Rate in ColoRectal Cancer Screening by Training General Practitioners in Motivational Interviewing

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital, BrestRan2021 to 2025Enrolled902ConditionsColorectal CancerArmsInteraction between patient and trained general practitioners in motivational interviewing
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Paul AujoulatUniversité de Bretagne Occidentale: Universite de Bretagne Occidentale, EA 7479 SPURBO, DUMG Brest, Brest, France. aujoulat.paul@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4760-224X
Delphine Le GoffUniversité de Bretagne Occidentale: Universite de Bretagne Occidentale, EA 7479 SPURBO, DUMG Brest, Brest, France.
Antoine DanyUniversité de Bretagne Occidentale: Universite de Bretagne Occidentale, EA 7479 SPURBO, DUMG Brest, Brest, France.
Michel RobaskiewickUniversité de Bretagne Occidentale: Universite de Bretagne Occidentale, EA 7479 SPURBO, DUMG Brest, Brest, France.
Jean Baptiste NousbaumUniversité de Bretagne Occidentale: Universite de Bretagne Occidentale, EA 7479 SPURBO, DUMG Brest, Brest, France.
Jeremy DerrienicUniversité de Bretagne Occidentale: Universite de Bretagne Occidentale, EA 7479 SPURBO, DUMG Brest, Brest, France.
Mélanie CariouUniversité de Bretagne Occidentale: Universite de Bretagne Occidentale, EA 7479 SPURBO, DUMG Brest, Brest, France.
Morgane GuillouUniversité de Bretagne Occidentale: Universite de Bretagne Occidentale, EA 7479 SPURBO, DUMG Brest, Brest, France.
Jean Yves Le ResteUniversité de Bretagne Occidentale: Universite de Bretagne Occidentale, EA 7479 SPURBO, DUMG Brest, Brest, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundColorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer death in France (17,712 annual deaths). However, this cancer is preventable in the majority of cases by the early detection of adenomas. In France, the organized screening for CRC relies on general practitioners (GPs). The tests delivered by the GPs are carried out in 89% of cases. However, GPs do not systematically offer the test, because of time management and communication.

methodsAmDepCCR is a cluster randomized trial. Patients are prospectively included by their GPs. The study is designed in 2 phases for the GPs: first, GPs who have never participated in motivational interviewing (MI) training will be recruited then randomly split in 2 groups. Secondly, a 6-day motivational interviewing training will be carried out for the intervention group. Then, patients will be included in both groups during a period of 1 year. The primary outcome will be the number of CRC screenings achieved in each group and its difference. The secondary outcome will be the reluctance to screening and the patient's self-estimated life expectancy at 0, 6, 12, and 24 months using the Health Belief Model (HBM). DISCUSSION: This study will help to know if GPs motivational interviewing is useful to improve organized CRC screening. In addition, it may help to improve communication between patients and GPs. GPs will be able to improve their practice in other fields of application through motivational interviewing (other screenings, addictions…).

trial registration2019-A01776-51 NCT04492215 .

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsGeneral PractitionersMotivational InterviewingEarly Detection of CancerHumansMass ScreeningCRC screeningEarly detectionMotivational interviewingPrimary careProfessional-patient relationsPsychological approachStudy protocol

Identifiers

PMID35164836
PMCPMC8842548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.