Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35164822›Full record

ArticleOrphanet journal of rare diseases2022

Development of models of care coordination for rare conditions: a qualitative study.

Holly Walton, Amy Simpson, Angus I G Ramsay, Amy Hunter, Jennifer Jones, Pei Li Ng, Kerry Leeson-Beevers, Lara Bloom, Joe Kai, Maria Kokocinska and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Coordination of care in the context of primary brain tumors: Australian healthcare professionals' exploration of the unspoken impact and clinical implications.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  2. Diagnosis, treatment, and management recommendations for cleidocranial dysplasia: A modified Delphi panel.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. 'If You Don't Fight for Yourself, No One Else Will': An In-Depth Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis of Rare Disorder Care Advocacy in Aotearoa New Zealand.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Downstream Exclusion in Rural Rare Disease Precision Medicine Research.The American journal of bioethics : AJOB · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Holly WaltonDepartment of Applied Health Research, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK. holly.walton@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-8746-059X
Amy SimpsonDepartment of Applied Health Research, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.
Angus I G RamsayDepartment of Applied Health Research, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.
Amy HunterGenetic Alliance UK, Creative Works, 7 Blackhorse Lane, London, E17 6DS, UK.
Jennifer JonesGenetic Alliance UK, Creative Works, 7 Blackhorse Lane, London, E17 6DS, UK.
Pei Li NgDepartment of Applied Health Research, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.
Kerry Leeson-BeeversAlstrom Syndrome UK, 4 St Kitts Close, Torquay, TQ2 7GD, Devon, UK.
Lara BloomPenn State College of Medicine, Hershey, USA.
Joe KaiDivision of Primary Care, Centre for Academic Primary Care, NIHR School for Primary Care Research, University of Nottingham, Floors 13-15, Tower Building, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK.
Maria KokocinskaBirmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Alastair G SutcliffeUCL and Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, 30 Guilford Street, London, WC1N 1EH, UK.
Stephen MorrisPrimary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Naomi J FulopDepartment of Applied Health Research, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionImproving care coordination for people with rare conditions may help to reduce burden on patients and carers and improve the care that patients receive. We recently developed a taxonomy of different ways of coordinating care for rare conditions. It is not yet known which models of care coordination are appropriate in different situations. This study aimed to: (1) explore what types of care coordination may be appropriate in different situations, and (2) use these findings to develop hypothetical models of care coordination for rare conditions.

methodsTo explore appropriateness of different types of care coordination, we conducted interviews (n = 30), four focus groups (n = 22) and two workshops (n = 27) with patients, carers, healthcare professionals, commissioners, and charity representatives. Participants were asked about preferences, benefits and challenges, and the factors influencing coordination. Thematic analysis was used to develop hypothetical models of care coordination. Models were refined following feedback from workshop participants.

resultsStakeholders prefer models of care that: are nationally centralised or a hybrid of national and local care, involve professionals collaborating to deliver care, have clear roles and responsibilities outlined (including administrative, coordinator, clinical and charity roles), provide access to records and offer flexible appointments (in terms of timing and mode). Many factors influenced coordination, including those relating to the patient (e.g., condition complexity, patient's location and ability to coordinate their own care), the healthcare professional (e.g., knowledge and time), the healthcare environment (e.g., resources) and societal factors (e.g., availability of funding). We developed and refined ten illustrative hypothetical models of care coordination for rare conditions.

conclusionFindings underline that different models of care coordination may be appropriate in different situations. It is possible to develop models of care coordination which are tailored to the individual in context. Findings may be used to facilitate planning around which models of care coordination may be appropriate in different services or circumstances. Findings may also be used by key stakeholders (e.g. patient organisations, clinicians and service planners) as a decision-making tool.

Indexed as

CaregiversDelivery of Health CareHumansQualitative ResearchCare coordinationHealth care organisationQualitativeRare conditionsRare diseases

Identifiers

PMID35164822
PMCPMC8843018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.