Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35164810›Full record

ArticleOrphanet journal of rare diseases2022

Modified Delphi procedure-based expert consensus on endpoints for an international disease registry for Metachromatic Leukodystrophy: The European Metachromatic Leukodystrophy initiative (MLDi).

Daphne H Schoenmakers, Shanice Beerepoot, Sibren van den Berg, Laura Adang, Annette Bley, Jaap-Jan Boelens, Francesca Fumagalli, Wim G Goettsch, Sabine Grønborg, Samuel Groeschel and 9 more

Abstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Daphne H SchoenmakersAmsterdam Leukodystrophy Center, Department of Child Neurology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Shanice BeerepootAmsterdam Leukodystrophy Center, Department of Child Neurology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Sibren van den BergDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Laura AdangDivision of Neurology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Annette BleyUniversity Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Jaap-Jan BoelensStem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapies Program, Department of Pediatrics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Francesca FumagalliSan Raffaele Telethon Institute for Gene Therapy (SR-Tiget); IRCCS, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Wim G GoettschZorginstituut Nederland (Dutch Health Care Institute), Diemen, The Netherlands.
Sabine GrønborgCentre for Inherited Metabolic Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital (Rigshospitalet), Copenhagen, Denmark.
Samuel GroeschelDepartment of Paediatric Neurology and Developmental Medicine, University Children's Hospital, Tübingen, Germany.
Peter M van HasseltDepartment of Pediatric Metabolic Diseases, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Carla E M HollakDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Caroline LindemansNierkens and Lindemans group, Princess Máxima Center for pediatric oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Fanny MochelINSERM U 1127, CNRS UMR 7225, Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06 UMR S 1127, Institut du Cerveau Et de La Moelle Épinière, ICM, 75013, Paris, France.
Peter G M MolDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Caroline SevinNeuroGenCell, Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle Épinière, ICM, Inserm U 1127, CNRS UMR 7225, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
Ayelet ZeremPediatric Neurology Institute, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
Ludger SchölsDepartment of Neurology and Hertie-Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Tübingen, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
Nicole I WolfAmsterdam Leukodystrophy Center, Department of Child Neurology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. n.wolf@amsterdamumc.nl.ORCID 0000-0003-1721-0728

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMetachromatic Leukodystrophy (MLD) is a rare lysosomal disorder. Patients suffer from relentless neurological deterioration leading to premature death. Recently, new treatment modalities, including gene therapy and enzyme replacement therapy, have been developed. Those advances increase the need for high-quality research infrastructure to adequately compare treatments, execute post-marketing surveillance, and perform health technology assessments (HTA). To facilitate this, a group of MLD experts started the MLD initiative (MLDi) and initiated an academia-led European MLD registry: the MLDi. An expert-based consensus procedure, namely a modified Delphi procedure, was used to determine the data elements required to answer academic, regulatory, and HTA research questions.

resultsThree distinct sets of data elements were defined by the 13-member expert panel. The minimal set (n = 13) contained demographics and basic disease characteristics. The core set (n = 55) included functional status scores in terms of motor, manual, speech and eating abilities, and causal and supportive treatment characteristics. Health-related quality of life scores were included that were also deemed necessary for HTA. The optional set (n = 31) contained additional clinical aspects, such as findings at neurological examination, detailed motor function, presence of peripheral neuropathy, gall bladder involvement and micturition.

conclusionUsing a modified Delphi procedure with physicians from the main expert centers, consensus was reached on a core set of data that can be collected retrospectively and prospectively. With this consensus-based approach, an important step towards harmonization was made. This unique dataset will support knowledge about the disease and facilitate regulatory requirements related to the launch of new treatments.

Indexed as

Leukodystrophy, MetachromaticConsensusHumansQuality of LifeRegistriesRetrospective StudiesDelphi procedureMetachromatic leukodystrophyMLDRare disease registryRare diseases

Identifiers

PMID35164810
PMCPMC8842918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.