Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35164739›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2022

Strengthening research capacity through an intensive training program for biomedical investigators from low- and middle-income countries: the Vanderbilt Institute for Research Development and Ethics (VIRDE).

Holly M Cassell, Elizabeth S Rose, Troy D Moon, Halima Bello-Manga, Muktar H Aliyu, Wilbroad Mutale

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Qualitative Research Leaders: Evaluation of Pilot Global Pipeline Program.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Holly M CassellVanderbilt Institute for Global Health, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 2525 West End Avenue Suite 750, Nashville, TN, 37203, USA. holly.cassell@vumc.org.
Elizabeth S RoseVanderbilt Institute for Global Health, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 2525 West End Avenue Suite 750, Nashville, TN, 37203, USA.
Troy D MoonVanderbilt Institute for Global Health, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 2525 West End Avenue Suite 750, Nashville, TN, 37203, USA.
Halima Bello-MangaDepartment of Hematology and Blood Transfusion, Barau Dikko Teaching Hospital/Kaduna State University, Kaduna, Nigeria.
Muktar H AliyuVanderbilt Institute for Global Health, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 2525 West End Avenue Suite 750, Nashville, TN, 37203, USA.
Wilbroad MutaleVanderbilt Institute for Global Health, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 2525 West End Avenue Suite 750, Nashville, TN, 37203, USA.

Funding

Primary Prevention of Stroke in Children with Sickle Cell Anaemia in Nigeria: Community vs Teaching HospitalK43TW011583 · FIC · BARAU DIKKO TEACHING HOSPITAL/ KADUNA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BELLO-MANGA, HALIMA · 2020 to 2024
$425k
FIC NIH HHS K43 TW011583
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCapacity strengthening initiatives aimed at increasing research knowledge and skills of investigators in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) have been implemented over the last several decades. With increased capacity, local investigators will have greater leadership in defining research priorities and impact policy change to help improve health outcomes. Evaluations of models of capacity strengthening programs are often limited to short-term impact. Noting the limitations of traditional output-based evaluations, we utilized a broader framework to evaluate the long-term impact of the Vanderbilt Institute in Research Development and Ethics (VIRDE), a decade-old intensive grant development practicum specifically tailored for investigators from LMICs.

methodsTo assess the impact of VIRDE on the research careers of alumni over the past 10 years, we surveyed alumni on research engagement, grant productivity, career trajectory, and knowledge gained in grant writing. Descriptive statistics, including means and total counts, and paired sample t-tests were used to analyze the data.

resultsForty-six of 58 alumni completed the survey. All respondents returned to their home countries and are currently engaged in research. Post-VIRDE grant writing knowledge ratings were significantly greater than pre-VIRDE. The number of respondents submitting grants post-VIRDE was 2.6 times higher than before the program. Eighty-three percent of respondents submitted a total of 147 grants post-VIRDE, of which 45.6% were awarded. Respondents acknowledged VIRDE's positive impact on career growth and leadership, with 88% advancing in career stage.

conclusionsGains in grant writing knowledge and grant productivity suggest that VIRDE scholars built skills and confidence in grant writing during the program. A substantial proportion of respondents have advanced in their careers and continue to work in academia in their country of origin. Results show a sustained impact on the research careers of VIRDE alumni. The broader framework for research capacity strengthening resulted in an expansive assessment of the VIRDE program and alumni, illuminating successful program elements and implications that can inform similar capacity strengthening programs.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchDeveloping CountriesAcademies and InstitutesEthics, ResearchHumansResearch PersonnelCapacity strengtheningGlobal healthLow- and middle-income countriesResearch training

Identifiers

PMID35164739
PMCPMC8842898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.