Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35164734›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2022

The lived experiences of a COVID-19 immunization programme: vaccine hesitancy and vaccine refusal.

Nee Nee Chan, Khang Wei Ong, Ching Sin Siau, Kai Wei Lee, Suat Cheng Peh, Shakila Yacob, Yook Chin Chia, Vei Ken Seow, Pei Boon Ooi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Nee Nee ChanDepartment of English and Education, Faculty of Social Sciences, Quest International University, 30250, Ipoh, Perak, Malaysia.
Khang Wei OngDepartment of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Quest International University, 30250, Ipoh, Perak, Malaysia.
Ching Sin SiauCentre for Community Health Studies (ReaCH), Faculty of Health Sciences, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 50300, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Kai Wei LeeDepartment of Pre-Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman, 43000, Kajang, Malaysia.
Suat Cheng PehJeffrey Sachs Center On Sustainable Development, Sunway University, Bandar Sunway, Malaysia.
Shakila YacobDepartment of History, Faculty of Arts & Social Sciences, University of Malaya, 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Yook Chin ChiaDepartment of Medical Sciences, School of Medical & Life Sciences, Sunway University, 47500, Bandar Sunway, Selangor, Malaysia.
Vei Ken SeowEmergency Medicine Department, Sunway Medical Centre, 47500, Bandar Sunway, Selangor, Malaysia. seowvk@sunway.com.my.
Pei Boon OoiDepartment of Medical Sciences, School of Medical & Life Sciences, Sunway University, 47500, Bandar Sunway, Selangor, Malaysia. peiboono@sunway.edu.my.

Funding

Sunway Medical Centre SRB/IIR/SMC/F/21/001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in a global health emergency and lock-down measures to curb the uncontrolled transmission chain. Vaccination is an effective measure against COVID-19 infections. In Malaysia amidst the national immunisation programme (NIP) which started in February 2021, there were rising concerns regarding the prevalence of vaccine hesitancy and refusal, and therefore, vaccine uptake among Malaysians. Although there are many quantitative studies on COVID-19 vaccination, the subjective experience of individuals was understudied. This study aims to explore the lived experiences of Malaysians regarding vaccine hesitancy and refusal, and facilitating factors that could enhance vaccine acceptance and uptake.

methodsThis qualitative study employed the hermeneutic phenomenological study design. Purposive sampling strategies were used to recruit Malaysians that had direct experiences with friends, family members and their community who were hesitating or refusing to accept the COVID-19 vaccines. A semi-structured interview guide was developed based on the expert knowledge of the investigators and existing literature on the topic. A series of focus group interviews (FGIs) was conducted online facilitated by a multidisciplinary team of experts. The group interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed.

resultsFifty-nine participants took part in seven FGIs. We found that "incongruence" was the overall thematic meaning that connected all the 3 main themes. These themes comprise firstly, the incongruence between the aims and implementation of the National Immunization Program which highlighted the gap between realities and needs on the ground. Secondly, the incongruence between Trust and Mistrust revealed a trust deficit in the government, COVID-19 news, and younger people's preference to follow the examples of local vaccination "heroes". Thirdly, the incongruence in communication showed the populace's mixed views regarding official media and local social media.

conclusionsThis study provided rich details on the complex picture of the COVID-19 immunization program in Malaysia and its impact on vaccine hesitancy and refusal. The inter-related and incongruent factors explained the operational difficulty and complexity of the NIP and the design of an effective health communication campaign. Identified gaps such as logistical implementation and communication strategies should be noted by policymakers in implementing mitigation plans.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesCommunicable Disease ControlHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2VaccinationVaccination HesitancyVaccination RefusalCOVID-19 VaccinesCOVID-19 Immunization ProgrammeLived ExperiencesMalaysiaVaccine HesitancyVaccine Refusal

Identifiers

PMID35164734
PMCPMC8842982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.