Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35164707›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2022

Increased condom use among key populations using oral PrEP in Kenya: results from large scale programmatic surveillance.

Griffins O Manguro, Abednego M Musau, Daniel K Were, Soud Tengah, Brian Wakhutu, Jason Reed, Marya Plotkin, Stanley Luchters, Peter Gichangi, Marleen Temmerman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Condom-Related Stigma Scale among Men Who Have Sex with Men in China: Development and Psychometric Tests.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Griffins O ManguroInternational Center for Reproductive Health Kenya, 3rd Avenue Nyali, P.O Box 91109-80103, Mombasa, Kenya. gmanguro@icrhk.org.
Abednego M MusauJhpiego Kenya, Nairobi, Kenya.
Daniel K WereJhpiego Kenya, Nairobi, Kenya.
Soud TengahJhpiego Kenya, Nairobi, Kenya.
Brian WakhutuJhpiego Kenya, Nairobi, Kenya.
Jason ReedJhpiego, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Marya PlotkinJhpiego, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Stanley LuchtersInstitute for Human Development, Aga Khan University, Nairobi, Kenya.
Peter GichangiTechnical University of Mombasa, Mombasa, Kenya.
Marleen TemmermanInternational Center for Reproductive Health Kenya, 3rd Avenue Nyali, P.O Box 91109-80103, Mombasa, Kenya.
Ghent University · BEInternational Centre for Reproductive Health Kenya · KEMonash University · AUTechnical University of Mombasa · KE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFemale sex workers (FSW) and men having sex with men (MSM) in Kenya have high rates of HIV infection. Following a 2015 WHO recommendation, Kenya initiated national scale-up of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for all persons at high-risk. Concerns have been raised about PrEP users' potential changes in sexual behaviors such adopting condomless sex and multiple partners as a result of perceived reduction in HIV risk, a phenomenon known as risk compensation. Increased condomless sex may lead to unintended pregnancies and sexually transmitted infections and has been described in research contexts but not in the programmatic setting. This study looks at changes in condom use among FSW and MSM on PrEP through a national a scale-up program.

methodsRoutine program data collected between February 2017 and December 2019 were used to assess changes in condom use during the first three months of PrEP in 80 health facilities supported by a scale-up project, Jilinde. The primary outcome was self-reported condom use. Analyses were conducted separately for FSW and for MSM. Log-Binomial Regression with Generalized Estimating Equations was used to compare the incidence proportion ("risk") of consistent condom use at the month 1, and month 3 visits relative to the initiation visit.

resultsAt initiation, 69% of FSW and 65% of MSM reported consistent condom use. At month 3, this rose to 87% for FSW and 91% for MSM. MSM were 24% more likely to report consistent condom use at month 1 (Relative Risk [RR], 1.24, 95% Confidence Interval [CI], 1.18-1.30) and 40% more likely at month 3 (RR, 1.40, 95% CI, 1.33-1.47) compared to at initiation. FSW were 15% more likely to report consistent condom use at the month one visit (RR, 1.15, 95% CI, 1.13-1.17) and 27% more likely to report condom use on the month 3 visit (RR 1.27, 95% CI, 1.24-1.29).

conclusionCondom use increased substantially among both FSW and MSM. This may be because oral PrEP was provided as part of a combination prevention strategy that included counseling and condoms but could also be due to the low retention rates among those who initiated.

Indexed as

Anti-HIV AgentsHIV InfectionsPre-Exposure ProphylaxisSexual and Gender MinoritiesSex WorkersCondomsFemaleHomosexuality, MaleHumansKenyaMaleSexual BehaviorSexual PartnersAnti-HIV AgentsFemale sex workersKenyaMen having sex with menPre Exposure ProphylaxisPrEPRisk compensationSub-Saharan Africa

Identifiers

PMID35164707
PMCPMC8842980
OpenAlexW4213035331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.