Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35164220›Full record

ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Umbrella Sampling Simulations of Carbon Nanoparticles Crossing Immiscible Solvents.

Anastasios Gotzias

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anastasios GotziasNational Centre for Scientific Research "Demokritos", Institute of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology INN, 15310 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-0823-0703
National Centre of Scientific Research "Demokritos" · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We use molecular dynamics to compute the free energy of carbon nanoparticles crossing a hydrophobic-hydrophilic interface. The simulations are performed on a biphasic system consisting of immiscible solvents (i.e., cyclohexane and water). We solvate a carbon nanoparticle into the cyclohexane layer and use a pull force to drive the nanoparticle into water, passing over the interface. Next, we accumulate a series of umbrella sampling simulations along the path of the nanoparticle and compute the solvation free energy with respect to the two solvents. We apply the method on three carbon nanoparticles (i.e., a carbon nanocone, a nanotube, and a graphene nanosheet). In addition, we record the water-accessible surface area of the nanoparticles during the umbrella simulations. Although we detect complete wetting of the external surface of the nanoparticles, the internal surface of the nanotube becomes partially wet, whereas that of the nanocone remains dry. This is due to the nanoconfinement of the particular nanoparticles, which shields the hydrophobic interactions encountered inside the pores. We show that cyclohexane molecules remain attached on the concave surface of the nanotube or the nanocone without being disturbed by the water molecules entering the cavity.

Indexed as

carbon nanoconesfree energygraphenemolecular dynamics

Identifiers

PMID35164220
PMCPMC8837927
OpenAlexW4210307209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.