Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35163682›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2022

On-Growth and In-Growth Osseointegration Enhancement in PM Porous Ti-Scaffolds by Two Different Bioactivation Strategies: Alkali Thermochemical Treatment and RGD Peptide Coating.

Katrin Steffanie Rappe, Monica Ortiz-Hernandez, Miquel Punset, Meritxell Molmeneu, Albert Barba, Carles Mas-Moruno, Jordi Guillem-Marti, Cristina Caparrós, Elisa Rupérez, José Calero and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Biomimetic Coatings in Implant Dentistry: A Quick Update.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Katrin Steffanie RappeSurgery Department, Veterinary School of Barcelona, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, 08193 Barcelona, Spain.
Monica Ortiz-HernandezBiomaterials, Biomechanics and Tissue Engineering Group (BBT), Department of Materials Science and Metallurgical Engineering, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC), 08019 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8875-9131
Miquel PunsetBiomaterials, Biomechanics and Tissue Engineering Group (BBT), Department of Materials Science and Metallurgical Engineering, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC), 08019 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1904-8667
Meritxell MolmeneuBiomaterials, Biomechanics and Tissue Engineering Group (BBT), Department of Materials Science and Metallurgical Engineering, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC), 08019 Barcelona, Spain.
Albert BarbaSurgery Department, Veterinary School of Barcelona, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, 08193 Barcelona, Spain.
Carles Mas-MorunoBiomaterials, Biomechanics and Tissue Engineering Group (BBT), Department of Materials Science and Metallurgical Engineering, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC), 08019 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8337-0872
Jordi Guillem-MartiBiomaterials, Biomechanics and Tissue Engineering Group (BBT), Department of Materials Science and Metallurgical Engineering, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC), 08019 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0307-2221
Cristina CaparrósBiomaterials, Biomechanics and Tissue Engineering Group (BBT), Department of Materials Science and Metallurgical Engineering, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC), 08019 Barcelona, Spain.
Elisa RupérezBiomaterials, Biomechanics and Tissue Engineering Group (BBT), Department of Materials Science and Metallurgical Engineering, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC), 08019 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8845-512X
José CaleroAMES GROUP S.A., Carretera Nacional 340, Pol. Ind. "Les Fallulles", 08620 Sant Vicenç dels Horts, Barcelona, Spain.
María-Cristina ManzanaresHuman Anatomy and Embryology Unit, Department of Pathology and Experimental Therapeutics, Universitat de Barcelona, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08907 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4585-4953
Javier GilFacultad de Odontología, Campus de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Internacional de Cataluña (UIC), 08017 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6824-1412
Jordi FranchSurgery Department, Veterinary School of Barcelona, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, 08193 Barcelona, Spain.
Institut de Recerca Sant Joan de DéuUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESAMES Group (Spain) · ESUniversitat de Barcelona · ESUniversitat Internacional de Catalunya · ESUniversitat Politècnica de Catalunya · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A lack of primary stability and osteointegration in metallic implants may result in implant loosening and failure. Adding porosity to metallic implants reduces the stress shielding effect and improves implant performance, allowing the surrounding bone tissue to grow into the scaffold. However, a bioactive surface is needed to stimulate implant osteointegration and improve mechanical stability. In this study, porous titanium implants were produced via powder sintering to create different porous diameters and open interconnectivity. Two strategies were used to generate a bioactive surface on the metallic foams: (1) an inorganic alkali thermochemical treatment, (2) grafting a cell adhesive tripeptide (RGD). RGD peptides exhibit an affinity for integrins expressed by osteoblasts, and have been reported to improve osteoblast adhesion, whereas the thermochemical treatment is known to improve titanium implant osseointegration upon implantation. Bioactivated scaffolds and control samples were implanted into the tibiae of rabbits to analyze the effect of these two strategies in vivo regarding bone tissue regeneration through interconnected porosity. Histomorphometric evaluation was performed at 4 and 12 weeks after implantation. Bone-to-implant contact (BIC) and bone in-growth and on-growth were evaluated in different regions of interest (ROIs) inside and outside the implant. The results of this study show that after a long-term postoperative period, the RGD-coated samples presented higher quantification values of quantified newly formed bone tissue in the implant's outer area. However, the total analyzed bone in-growth was observed to be slightly greater in the scaffolds treated with alkali thermochemical treatment. These results suggest that both strategies contribute to enhancing porous metallic implant stability and osteointegration, and a combination of both strategies might be worth pursuing.

Indexed as

MetallurgyOsseointegrationTemperatureAlkaliesAnimalsCoated Materials, BiocompatibleFemaleImplants, ExperimentalOligopeptidesOsteogenesisPorosityPowdersRabbitsTissue ScaffoldsTitaniumAlkaliesarginyl-glycyl-aspartic acidCoated Materials, BiocompatibleOligopeptidesPowdersTitaniumbone in-growthbone on-growthhistomorphometric evaluationin vivo implantationosseointegrationRGD peptidethermochemical treatmenttitanium foams

Identifiers

PMID35163682
PMCPMC8835960
OpenAlexW4210388945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.