Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35163678›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2022

CRISPR Approaches for the Diagnosis of Human Diseases.

Pilar Puig-Serra, Maria Cruz Casado-Rosas, Marta Martinez-Lage, Beatriz Olalla-Sastre, Alejandro Alonso-Yanez, Raul Torres-Ruiz, Sandra Rodriguez-Perales

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Detection of respiratory syncytial virus based on RT-RPA and CRISPR-Cas12a.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. CRISPR applications in cancer diagnosis and treatment.Cellular & molecular biology letters · 2023
    Review
  13. Review
  14. A Lateral Flow Assay for the Detection ofSensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Pilar Puig-SerraHuman Cancer Genetics Program, Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Oncologicas (CNIO), Molecular Cytogenetics & Genome Editing Unit, Melchor Fernandez Almagro, 3, 28029 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7802-4972
Maria Cruz Casado-RosasHuman Cancer Genetics Program, Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Oncologicas (CNIO), Molecular Cytogenetics & Genome Editing Unit, Melchor Fernandez Almagro, 3, 28029 Madrid, Spain.
Marta Martinez-LageHuman Cancer Genetics Program, Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Oncologicas (CNIO), Molecular Cytogenetics & Genome Editing Unit, Melchor Fernandez Almagro, 3, 28029 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5535-025X
Beatriz Olalla-SastreHuman Cancer Genetics Program, Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Oncologicas (CNIO), Molecular Cytogenetics & Genome Editing Unit, Melchor Fernandez Almagro, 3, 28029 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7225-231X
Alejandro Alonso-YanezHuman Cancer Genetics Program, Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Oncologicas (CNIO), Molecular Cytogenetics & Genome Editing Unit, Melchor Fernandez Almagro, 3, 28029 Madrid, Spain.
Raul Torres-RuizHuman Cancer Genetics Program, Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Oncologicas (CNIO), Molecular Cytogenetics & Genome Editing Unit, Melchor Fernandez Almagro, 3, 28029 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9606-0398
Sandra Rodriguez-PeralesHuman Cancer Genetics Program, Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Oncologicas (CNIO), Molecular Cytogenetics & Genome Editing Unit, Melchor Fernandez Almagro, 3, 28029 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7221-3636

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CRISPR/Cas is a prokaryotic self-defense system, widely known for its use as a gene-editing tool. Because of their high specificity to detect DNA and RNA sequences, different CRISPR systems have been adapted for nucleic acid detection. CRISPR detection technologies differ highly among them, since they are based on four of the six major subtypes of CRISPR systems. In just 5 years, the CRISPR diagnostic field has rapidly expanded, growing from a set of specific molecular biology discoveries to multiple FDA-authorized COVID-19 tests and the establishment of several companies. CRISPR-based detection methods are coupled with pre-existing preamplification and readout technologies, achieving sensitivity and reproducibility comparable to the current gold standard nucleic acid detection methods. Moreover, they are very versatile, can be easily implemented to detect emerging pathogens and new clinically relevant mutations, and offer multiplexing capability. The advantages of the CRISPR-based diagnostic approaches are a short sample-to-answer time and no requirement of laboratory settings; they are also much more affordable than current nucleic acid detection procedures. In this review, we summarize the applications and development trends of the CRISPR/Cas13 system in the identification of particular pathogens and mutations and discuss the challenges and future prospects of CRISPR-based diagnostic platforms in biomedicine.

Indexed as

COVID-19CRISPR-Cas SystemsDiagnosisDiagnostic Techniques and ProceduresDiseaseDNAGene EditingHumansReproducibility of ResultsSARS-CoV-2DNACas13CRISPRdiagnostichuman diseases

Identifiers

PMID35163678
PMCPMC8836363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.