Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35163657›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2022

3D Printed Graphene-PLA Scaffolds Promote Cell Alignment and Differentiation.

Matteo Gasparotto, Pietro Bellet, Giorgia Scapin, Rebecca Busetto, Chiara Rampazzo, Libero Vitiello, Dhvanit Indravadan Shah, Francesco Filippini

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Starch-Based Scaffolds for Cultivated Meat Production: Challenges and Perspectives.Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Graphene in 3D Bioprinting.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Matteo GasparottoSynthetic Biology and Biotechnology Unit, Department of Biology, University of Padua, 35131 Padua, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4933-2578
Pietro BelletSynthetic Biology and Biotechnology Unit, Department of Biology, University of Padua, 35131 Padua, Italy.
Giorgia ScapinGaruda Therapeutics, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA.
Rebecca BusettoSynthetic Biology and Biotechnology Unit, Department of Biology, University of Padua, 35131 Padua, Italy.
Chiara RampazzoDepartment of Biology, University of Padua, 35131 Padua, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1092-2653
Libero VitielloDepartment of Biology, University of Padua, 35131 Padua, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0017-0838
Dhvanit Indravadan ShahGaruda Therapeutics, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA.
Francesco FilippiniSynthetic Biology and Biotechnology Unit, Department of Biology, University of Padua, 35131 Padua, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5672-0726
University of Padua · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traumas and chronic damages can hamper the regenerative power of nervous, muscle, and connective tissues. Tissue engineering approaches are promising therapeutic tools, aiming to develop reliable, reproducible, and economically affordable synthetic scaffolds which could provide sufficient biomimetic cues to promote the desired cell behaviour without triggering graft rejection and transplant failure. Here, we used 3D-printing to develop 3D-printed scaffolds based on either PLA or graphene@PLA with a defined pattern. Multiple regeneration strategies require a specific orientation of implanted and recruited cells to perform their function correctly. We tested our scaffolds with induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC), neuronal-like cells, immortalised fibroblasts and myoblasts. Our results demonstrated that the specific "lines and ridges" 100 µm-scaffold topography is sufficient to promote myoblast and fibroblast cell alignment and orient neurites along with the scaffolds line pattern. Conversely, graphene is critical to promote cells differentiation, as seen by the iPSC commitment to neuroectoderm, and myoblast fusions into multinuclear myotubes achieved by the 100 µm scaffolds containing graphene. This work shows the development of a reliable and economical 3D-printed scaffold with the potential of being used in multiple tissue engineering applications and elucidates how scaffold micro-topography and graphene properties synergistically control cell differentiation.

Indexed as

Cell DifferentiationPrinting, Three-DimensionalCell FusionCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationCell SurvivalFibroblastsGraphiteHumansInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsMyoblastsNeuritesNeurogenesisPolyestersTelomeraseTissue ScaffoldsGraphitePolyesterspoly(lactide)Telomerase3D printingG+Grafylongrapheneneuronal differentiationPLAregenerative medicinescaffoldstem cells

Identifiers

PMID35163657
PMCPMC8836229
OpenAlexW4210594450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.