Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35163467›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2022

R-Loop-Associated Genomic Instability and Implication of WRN and WRNIP1.

Veronica Marabitti, Pasquale Valenzisi, Giorgia Lillo, Eva Malacaria, Valentina Palermo, Pietro Pichierri, Annapaola Franchitto

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The Zinc Finger Ran-Binding Protein 3 (ZRANB3): An Advanced Perspective.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  3. The function of Mgs1/WRNIP1 in genome maintenance.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Secondary structures in RNA synthesis, splicing and translation.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Veronica MarabittiDepartment of Environment and Health, Section of Mechanisms Biomarkers and Models, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Viale Regina Elena 299, 00161 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5941-9656
Pasquale ValenzisiDepartment of Environment and Health, Section of Mechanisms Biomarkers and Models, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Viale Regina Elena 299, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Giorgia LilloDepartment of Environment and Health, Section of Mechanisms Biomarkers and Models, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Viale Regina Elena 299, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Eva MalacariaDepartment of Environment and Health, Section of Mechanisms Biomarkers and Models, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Viale Regina Elena 299, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Valentina PalermoDepartment of Environment and Health, Section of Mechanisms Biomarkers and Models, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Viale Regina Elena 299, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Pietro PichierriDepartment of Environment and Health, Section of Mechanisms Biomarkers and Models, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Viale Regina Elena 299, 00161 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2702-3523
Annapaola FranchittoDepartment of Environment and Health, Section of Mechanisms Biomarkers and Models, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Viale Regina Elena 299, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Istituto Superiore di Sanità · IT

Funding

Italian Association for Cancer Research A.F. (IG #19971) and P.P. (IG #17383)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Maintenance of genome stability is crucial for cell survival and relies on accurate DNA replication. However, replication fork progression is under constant attack from different exogenous and endogenous factors that can give rise to replication stress, a source of genomic instability and a notable hallmark of pre-cancerous and cancerous cells. Notably, one of the major natural threats for DNA replication is transcription. Encounters or conflicts between replication and transcription are unavoidable, as they compete for the same DNA template, so that collisions occur quite frequently. The main harmful transcription-associated structures are R-loops. These are DNA structures consisting of a DNA-RNA hybrid and a displaced single-stranded DNA, which play important physiological roles. However, if their homeostasis is altered, they become a potent source of replication stress and genome instability giving rise to several human diseases, including cancer. To combat the deleterious consequences of pathological R-loop persistence, cells have evolved multiple mechanisms, and an ever growing number of replication fork protection factors have been implicated in preventing/removing these harmful structures; however, many others are perhaps still unknown. In this review, we report the current knowledge on how aberrant R-loops affect genome integrity and how they are handled, and we discuss our recent findings on the role played by two fork protection factors, the Werner syndrome protein (WRN) and the Werner helicase-interacting protein 1 (WRNIP1) in response to R-loop-induced genome instability.

Indexed as

Genomic InstabilityATPases Associated with Diverse Cellular ActivitiesDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA ReplicationHumansR-Loop StructuresTranscription, GeneticWerner Syndrome HelicaseATPases Associated with Diverse Cellular ActivitiesDNA-Binding ProteinsWerner Syndrome HelicaseWRNIP1 protein, humanWRN protein, humanDNA repairgenomic instabilityRecQ helicasesreplication stressR-loops

Identifiers

PMID35163467
PMCPMC8836129
OpenAlexW4210263280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.