ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2022
More Is Not Always Better: Local Models Provide Accurate Predictions of Spectral Properties of Porphyrins.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- In silico prediction of drug-induced cardiotoxicity with ensemble machine learning and structural pattern recognition.Molecular diversity · 2026Article
- Data-Driven Insights into Porphyrin Geometry: Interpretable AI for Non-Planarity and Aromaticity Analyses.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2025Article
- Prediction of Pt, Ir, Ru, and Rh complexes light absorption in the therapeutic window for phototherapy using machine learning.Journal of cheminformatics · 2025Article
- Progress of the "Molecular Informatics" Section in 2022.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Synthesis, Structure, and Spectral-Luminescent Properties of Peripherally Fluorinated Mg(II) and Zn(II) Octaphenyltetraazaporphyrins.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The development of new functional materials based on porphyrins requires fast and accurate prediction of their spectral properties. The available models in the literature for absorption wavelength and extinction coefficient of the Soret band have low accuracy for this class of compounds. We collected spectral data for porphyrins to extend the literature set and compared the performance of global and local models for their modelling using different machine learning methods. Interestingly, extension of the public database contributed models with lower accuracies compared to the models, which we built using porphyrins only. The later model calculated acceptable RMSE = 2.61 for prediction of the absorption band of 335 porphyrins synthesized in our laboratory, but had a low accuracy (RMSE = 0.52) for extinction coefficient. A development of models using only compounds from our laboratory significantly decreased errors for these compounds (RMSE = 0.5 and 0.042 for absorption band and extinction coefficient, respectively), but limited their applicability only to these homologous series. When developing models, one should clearly keep in mind their potential use and select a strategy that could contribute the most accurate predictions for the target application. The models and data are publicly available.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.