Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35163092›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2022

Spheroid Culture Differentially Affects Cancer Cell Sensitivity to Drugs in Melanoma and RCC Models.

Aleksandra Filipiak-Duliban, Klaudia Brodaczewska, Arkadiusz Kajdasz, Claudine Kieda

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Genotoxicity of cancer therapies and the risk of secondary malignancies: toward personalized prevention.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Research Progress on Neural Cell Culture Systems.Current neuropharmacology · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. c-MetBiomedicines · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Aleksandra Filipiak-DulibanLaboratory of Molecular Oncology and Innovative Therapies, Military Institute of Medicine, 04-141 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-8118-8468
Klaudia BrodaczewskaLaboratory of Molecular Oncology and Innovative Therapies, Military Institute of Medicine, 04-141 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-2374-3600
Arkadiusz KajdaszDepartment of RNA Metabolism, Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Polish Academy of Sciences, Noskowskiego 12/14, 61-704 Poznan, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-5948-1764
Claudine KiedaCenter for Molecular Biophysics UPR 4301 CNRS, CEDEX 2, 45071 Orleans, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7573-029X
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRInstitute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Polish Academy of Sciences · PLMedical University of Warsaw · PLWojskowy Instytut Medycyny Lotniczej · PL

Funding

European Social Fund: POWER "Next generation sequencing technologies in biomedicine and personalized medicine"Military Institute of Medicine intramural grant 1/9014 (505)National Science Centre, Poland Grant 2016/23/B/NZ1/03211
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

2D culture as a model for drug testing often turns to be clinically futile. Therefore, 3D cultures (3Ds) show potential to better model responses to drugs observed in vivo. In preliminary studies, using melanoma (B16F10) and renal (RenCa) cancer, we confirmed that 3Ds better mimics the tumor microenvironment. Here, we evaluated how the proposed 3D mode of culture affects tumor cell susceptibility to anti-cancer drugs, which have distinct mechanisms of action (everolimus, doxorubicin, cisplatin). Melanoma spheroids showed higher resistance to all used drugs, as compared to 2D. In an RCC model, such modulation was only observed for doxorubicin treatment. As drug distribution was not affected by the 3D shape, we assessed the expression of MDR1 and mTor. Upregulation of MDR1 in RCC spheroids was observed, in contrast to melanoma. In both models, mTor expression was not affected by the 3D cultures. By NGS, 10 genes related with metabolism of xenobiotics by cytochrome p450 were deregulated in renal cancer spheroids; 9 of them were later confirmed in the melanoma model. The differences between 3D models and classical 2D cultures point to the potential to uncover new non-canonical mechanisms to explain drug resistance set by the tumor in its microenvironment.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, NeoplasmAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Renal CellCell SurvivalGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansKidney NeoplasmsMelanoma, ExperimentalSpheroids, CellularTumor Cells, CulturedTumor MicroenvironmentAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, Tumor3Dcisplatincytochromedoxorubicindrug-resistanceeverolimusglutathione-s-transferasesmelanomaRCCspheroids

Identifiers

PMID35163092
PMCPMC8835769
OpenAlexW4206268512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.