Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35163063›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2022

The Optimized Delivery of Triterpenes by Liposomal Nanoformulations: Overcoming the Challenges.

Andreea Milan, Alexandra Mioc, Alexandra Prodea, Marius Mioc, Roxana Buzatu, Roxana Ghiulai, Roxana Racoviceanu, Florina Caruntu, Codruţa Şoica

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Terpenoids as modulators of autophagy-senescence crosstalk in lung cancer.Daru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Repositioning Antimicrobial Peptides Against WHO-Priority Fungi.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Andreea MilanFaculty of Pharmacy, "Victor Babeş" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 2 E. Murgu Sq., 300041 Timişoara, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-6588-3241
Alexandra MiocFaculty of Pharmacy, "Victor Babeş" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 2 E. Murgu Sq., 300041 Timişoara, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-6459-2074
Alexandra ProdeaFaculty of Pharmacy, "Victor Babeş" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 2 E. Murgu Sq., 300041 Timişoara, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-7955-422X
Marius MiocFaculty of Pharmacy, "Victor Babeş" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 2 E. Murgu Sq., 300041 Timişoara, Romania.
Roxana BuzatuFaculty of Dental Medicine, "Victor Babeş" University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timişoara, 2 Eftimie Murgu Street, 300041 Timişoara, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-0653-0996
Roxana GhiulaiFaculty of Pharmacy, "Victor Babeş" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 2 E. Murgu Sq., 300041 Timişoara, Romania.
Roxana RacoviceanuFaculty of Pharmacy, "Victor Babeş" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 2 E. Murgu Sq., 300041 Timişoara, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-3378-0774
Florina CaruntuFaculty of Medicine, "Victor Babeş" University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timişoara, 2 Eftimie Murgu Street, 300041 Timişoara, Romania.
Codruţa ŞoicaFaculty of Pharmacy, "Victor Babeş" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 2 E. Murgu Sq., 300041 Timişoara, Romania.

Funding

Unitatea Executiva Pentru Finantarea Invatamantului Superior a Cercetarii Dezvoltarii si Inovarii PN-III-P1-1.1-PD-2019-1078"Victor Babes" University of Medicine and Pharmacy 1EXP/1233/30.01.2020 LUPSKINPATH
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The last decade has witnessed a sustained increase in the research development of modern-day chemo-therapeutics, especially for those used for high mortality rate pathologies. However, the therapeutic landscape is continuously changing as a result of the currently existing toxic side effects induced by a substantial range of drug classes. One growing research direction driven to mitigate such inconveniences has converged towards the study of natural molecules for their promising therapeutic potential. Triterpenes are one such class of compounds, intensively investigated for their therapeutic versatility. Although the pharmacological effects reported for several representatives of this class has come as a well-deserved encouragement, the pharmacokinetic profile of these molecules has turned out to be an unwelcomed disappointment. Nevertheless, the light at the end of the tunnel arrived with the development of nanotechnology, more specifically, the use of liposomes as drug delivery systems. Liposomes are easily synthesizable phospholipid-based vesicles, with highly tunable surfaces, that have the ability to transport both hydrophilic and lipophilic structures ensuring superior drug bioavailability at the action site as well as an increased selectivity. This study aims to report the results related to the development of different types of liposomes, used as targeted vectors for the delivery of various triterpenes of high pharmacological interest.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicDrug Delivery SystemsHumansLiposomesNanoparticlesTriterpenesLiposomesTriterpenesliposomesnanocarriersnano-therapytargeted deliverytriterpenes

Identifiers

PMID35163063
PMCPMC8835305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.