Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35163015›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2022

Abiotic Stress and Belowground Microbiome: The Potential of Omics Approaches.

Marco Sandrini, Luca Nerva, Fabiano Sillo, Raffaella Balestrini, Walter Chitarra, Elisa Zampieri

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Marco SandriniResearch Center for Viticulture and Enology, Council for Agricultural Research and Economics, 31015 Conegliano, Italy.
Luca NervaResearch Center for Viticulture and Enology, Council for Agricultural Research and Economics, 31015 Conegliano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5009-5798
Fabiano SilloNational Research Council, Institute for Sustainable Plant Protection, Strada delle Cacce 73, 10135 Torino, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1218-9985
Raffaella BalestriniNational Research Council, Institute for Sustainable Plant Protection, Strada delle Cacce 73, 10135 Torino, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7958-7681
Walter ChitarraResearch Center for Viticulture and Enology, Council for Agricultural Research and Economics, 31015 Conegliano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5382-3794
Elisa ZampieriNational Research Council, Institute for Sustainable Plant Protection, Strada delle Cacce 73, 10135 Torino, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4623-1747

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nowadays, the worldwide agriculture is experiencing a transition process toward more sustainable production, which requires the reduction of chemical inputs and the preservation of microbiomes' richness and biodiversity. Plants are no longer considered as standalone entities, and the future of agriculture should be grounded on the study of plant-associated microorganisms and all their potentiality. Moreover, due to the climate change scenario and the resulting rising incidence of abiotic stresses, an innovative and environmentally friendly technique in agroecosystem management is required to support plants in facing hostile environments. Plant-associated microorganisms have shown a great attitude as a promising tool to improve agriculture sustainability and to deal with harsh environments. Several studies were carried out in recent years looking for some beneficial plant-associated microbes and, on the basis of them, it is evident that Actinomycetes and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) have shown a considerable number of positive effects on plants' fitness and health. Given the potential of these microorganisms and the effects of climate change, this review will be focused on their ability to support the plant during the interaction with abiotic stresses and on multi-omics techniques which can support researchers in unearthing the hidden world of plant-microbiome interactions. These associated microorganisms can increase plants' endurance of abiotic stresses through several mechanisms, such as growth-promoting traits or priming-mediated stress tolerance. Using a multi-omics approach, it will be possible to deepen these mechanisms and the dynamic of belowground microbiomes, gaining fundamental information to exploit them as staunch allies and innovative weapons against crop abiotic enemies threatening crops in the ongoing global climate change context.

Indexed as

ActinobacteriaClimate ChangeComputational BiologyCrops, AgriculturalGenomicsMetabolomicsMycorrhizaePlant DevelopmentSoil MicrobiologyStress, PhysiologicalSystems Biologyabiotic stressActinomycetesarbuscular mycorrhizal fungiclimate changeomics toolsplant–microbe interactions

Identifiers

PMID35163015
PMCPMC8835006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.