Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35162968›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2022

Active Materials for 3D Printing in Small Animals: Current Modalities and Future Directions for Orthopedic Applications.

Parastoo Memarian, Elham Pishavar, Federica Zanotti, Martina Trentini, Francesca Camponogara, Elisa Soliani, Paolo Gargiulo, Maurizio Isola, Barbara Zavan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Parastoo MemarianDepartment of Animal Medicine, Productions and Health, University of Padova, 35020 Padova, Italy.
Elham PishavarDepartment of Translational Medicine, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy.
Federica ZanottiDepartment of Translational Medicine, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy.
Martina TrentiniDepartment of Translational Medicine, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy.
Francesca CamponogaraDepartment of Translational Medicine, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy.
Elisa SolianiEngineering Department, King's College, London WC2R 2LS, UK.
Paolo GargiuloInstitute for Biomedical and Neural Engineering, Reykjavík University, 101 Reykjavík, Iceland.ORCID 0000-0002-5049-4817
Maurizio IsolaDepartment of Animal Medicine, Productions and Health, University of Padova, 35020 Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3269-509X
Barbara ZavanDepartment of Translational Medicine, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4779-4456

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The successful clinical application of bone tissue engineering requires customized implants based on the receiver's bone anatomy and defect characteristics. Three-dimensional (3D) printing in small animal orthopedics has recently emerged as a valuable approach in fabricating individualized implants for receiver-specific needs. In veterinary medicine, because of the wide range of dimensions and anatomical variances, receiver-specific diagnosis and therapy are even more critical. The ability to generate 3D anatomical models and customize orthopedic instruments, implants, and scaffolds are advantages of 3D printing in small animal orthopedics. Furthermore, this technology provides veterinary medicine with a powerful tool that improves performance, precision, and cost-effectiveness. Nonetheless, the individualized 3D-printed implants have benefited several complex orthopedic procedures in small animals, including joint replacement surgeries, critical size bone defects, tibial tuberosity advancement, patellar groove replacement, limb-sparing surgeries, and other complex orthopedic procedures. The main purpose of this review is to discuss the application of 3D printing in small animal orthopedics based on already published papers as well as the techniques and materials used to fabricate 3D-printed objects. Finally, the advantages, current limitations, and future directions of 3D printing in small animal orthopedics have been addressed.

Indexed as

AnimalsHumansModels, AnatomicModels, AnimalOrthopedic ProceduresPrinting, Three-DimensionalProstheses and Implants3D printingmaterialsorthopedicsreceiver-specificveterinary

Identifiers

PMID35162968
PMCPMC8834768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.