Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35162865›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Measuring Productivity, Perceived Stress and Work Engagement of a Nationally Delivered Workplace Step Count Challenge.

Gemma C Ryde, Simone A Tomaz, Krissi Sandison, Carl Greenwood, Paul Kelly

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gemma C RydeInstitute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, 126 University Place, Glasgow G12 8TA, UK.
Simone A TomazInstitute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, 126 University Place, Glasgow G12 8TA, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7531-3250
Krissi SandisonDivision of Sport, Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LA, UK.
Carl GreenwoodPaths for All, Kintail House, Forthside Way, Stirling FK8 1QZ, UK.
Paul KellyPhysical Activity for Health Research Centre (PAHRC), The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 8AQ, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1946-9848

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Workplace step count challenges show promise with regard to increasing physical activity, with walking linked to many positive physical and mental health benefits. Few studies have investigated their effects on work-related outcomes. The aim of this study was to describe (1) the process of collecting work-related outcomes as part of a real-world workplace intervention, the Step Count Challenge, and (2) report step counts and work-related outcomes (productivity, perceived stress and work engagement) during the Step Count Challenge. This pre-post study was conducted as part of a four-week 2018 National Step Count Challenge (SCC) in Scotland, UK. A survey was administered to collect self-reported steps, productivity (HWQ), perceived stress (Cohen Perceived Stress Scale) and work engagement (UWES) on the week prior to the intervention starting (baseline), week 1 and week 4. Process data such as recruitment and response rates were monitored throughout. Of 2042 employees who signed up to the SCC, baseline data were reported for 246 (12% of total; mean age 42.5 years, 83% female). Process data suggest low uptake to the study and poor compliance between surveys time points. Preliminary data suggest positive changes in step counts (3374 steps/day by week 4), stress and productivity. No changes in work engagement were found. The findings highlight the need to integrate research more effectively into real-world interventions, including a true baseline period. The Step Count Challenge may have positive change on some work-related outcomes warranting further investigation into how robust research designs can be delivered without negatively influencing real-world interventions.

Indexed as

Work EngagementWorkplaceAdultEfficiencyFemaleHumansMaleStress, PsychologicalWalkingphysical activityproductivitystepsstresswalkingwork engagementworkplace

Identifiers

PMID35162865
PMCPMC8835687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.