Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35162820›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Are Small Animal Practitioners Occupationally Exposed to Leptospirosis? Results of a Serological Survey.

Elisa Mazzotta, Laura Lucchese, Cristiano Salata, Tommaso Furlanello, Ermenegildo Baroni, Alessandro Zotti, Gabriele Venturi, Alice Fincato, Silvia Marchione, Katia Capello and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Synanthropic and Wild Animals as Sentinels of Zoonotic Agents: A Study ofInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  3. Outbreak ofInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Elisa MazzottaIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie, 35020 Legnaro, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2369-8467
Laura LuccheseIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie, 35020 Legnaro, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4255-9024
Cristiano SalataDepartment of Molecular Medicine, University of Padova, 35121 Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5136-7406
Tommaso FurlanelloClinica Veterinaria San Marco, 35030 Veggiano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1935-5146
Ermenegildo BaroniClinica Veterinaria Baroni, 45100 Rovigo, Italy.
Alessandro ZottiDepartment of Animal Medicine, Production and Health, University of Padova, 35020 Legnaro, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9279-5140
Gabriele VenturiFreelance Small Animal Practitioner, 40126 Bologna, Italy.
Alice FincatoIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie, 35020 Legnaro, Italy.
Silvia MarchioneIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie, 35020 Legnaro, Italy.
Katia CapelloIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie, 35020 Legnaro, Italy.
Alda NataleIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie, 35020 Legnaro, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2104-4531

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Leptospirosis is a worldwide zoonosis frequently responsible for clinical disease in dogs and rarely reported in human people. The risk of human exposure to Leptospira has been investigated in a sample population working in the northeast of Italy, a geographical area with high endemicity of canine leptospirosis. Two-hundred twenty-one human serum samples were analyzed for Leptospira microagglutination test (MAT): 112 clinical freelance small animal practitioners (exposed subjects) and 109 people not occupationally exposed to Leptospira-infected animals (unexposed subjects) were voluntarily enrolled. Despite the previously reported serological detection of antibodies vs. Leptospira in people in different Italian regions, this study did not detect any reactivity in the investigated population. This study shows that veterinarians do not appear to be at a greater risk of leptospirosis than the reference population. This may be due to both veterinarian awareness of the Leptospira zoonotic risk and the efficiency of the preventive measures and management of patients. Moreover, it could be the result of the relatively low excretion of Leptospira in symptomatic dogs, which can be considered as an environmental sentinel for Leptospira presence rather than a vehicle of transmission.

Indexed as

LeptospiraLeptospirosisVeterinariansAnimalsAntibodies, BacterialDogsHumansItalyZoonosesAntibodies, BacterialhumanLeptospira antibodiesmicroagglutination test (MAT)occupational exposurepeople

Identifiers

PMID35162820
PMCPMC8835096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.