Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35162798›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Supporting Perinatal Mental Health and Wellbeing during COVID-19.

Laura Bridle, Laura Walton, Tessa van der Vord, Olawunmi Adebayo, Suzy Hall, Emma Finlayson, Abigail Easter, Sergio A Silverio

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Laura BridleWomen's Services, St. Thomas' Hospital, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London SE1 7EH, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6352-2207
Laura WaltonWomen's and Children's Division, Princess Royal University Hospital, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London BR6 8ND, UK.
Tessa van der VordWomen's Health Services, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, Chelsea and Westminster NHS Foundation Trust, London SW10 9NH, UK.
Olawunmi AdebayoMaternity Services, Watford General Hospital, West Hertfordshire Hospitals NHS Trust, Watford WD18 0HB, UK.
Suzy HallMaternity Services, University Hospital Lewisham, Lewisham and Greenwich NHS Trust, London SE13 6LH, UK.
Emma FinlaysonWomen's Services, St. Thomas' Hospital, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London SE1 7EH, UK.
Abigail EasterDepartment of Women & Children's Health, School of Life Course & Population Sciences, King's College London, London WC2R 2LS, UK.
Sergio A SilverioDepartment of Women & Children's Health, School of Life Course & Population Sciences, King's College London, London WC2R 2LS, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7177-3471
King's College London · GBSt Thomas' Hospital · GBChelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · GBPrincess Royal University Hospital · GBUniversity Hospital Lewisham · GBWest Hertfordshire Hospitals NHS Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mental health is especially important as women transition into parenthood. The COVID-19 pandemic has necessitated the rapid reconfiguration of maternity services, including perinatal mental healthcare, as offered by Specialist Perinatal Mental Health Midwives, in NHS Trusts in the United Kingdom. This article represents work undertaken in rapid response to the COVID-19 pandemic and aims to document the findings from March 2020 up until May 2021 in literature published on perinatal mental health through the pandemic, as well as to engage in a knowledge mapping exercise across five NHS Trusts in London. In this research, we utilised a critical review methodology which purposefully selects and synthesises materials after extensive literature searching to provide a broad and informed narrative around an issue. For our knowledge mapping exercise, we utilised an inclusive stance to gather, pool, and synthesise data from five NHS Trusts regarding the provisions and reconfigurations of their perinatal mental health services, creating a comparable and translatable snapshot in time. Our rapid, critical review highlighted two themes: 'Increased Perinatal Distress' and 'Inaccessible Services and Support'. Our knowledge mapping exercise produced four themes: 'Retention of Existing Service Provision'; 'Additional Services Provided'; 'Reconfiguration of Service Provision'; 'Additional Provision to Support Staff Wellbeing'. We conclude by offering best practice guidance in order to provide shared learning to aid the transition through para-pandemic circumstances to service delivery in a post-pandemic 'new normal'.

Indexed as

COVID-19FemaleHumansMental HealthPandemicsParturitionPregnancySARS-CoV-2childbirthCOVID-19midwivesperinatal mental healthpostpartumpregnancywomen’s health

Identifiers

PMID35162798
PMCPMC8835495
OpenAlexW4210637886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.