Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35162726›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

COVID-19 Study on Scientific Articles in Health Communication: A Science Mapping Analysis in Web of Science.

Carlos de Las Heras-Pedrosa, Carmen Jambrino-Maldonado, Dolores Rando-Cueto, Patricia P Iglesias-Sánchez

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Bibliometric analysis of oncology communication from 1976 to 2025: a focus on narrative medicine.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Carlos de Las Heras-PedrosaFaculty of Communications Sciences, Universidad de Málaga, 29016 Málaga, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2738-4177
Carmen Jambrino-MaldonadoFaculty of Commerce and Management, Universidad de Málaga, 29016 Málaga, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8444-0967
Dolores Rando-CuetoFaculty of Communications Sciences, Universidad de Málaga, 29016 Málaga, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8512-5034
Patricia P Iglesias-SánchezFaculty of Commerce and Management, Universidad de Málaga, 29016 Málaga, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5591-2248

Funding

Regional Government of Andalusia UMA18-FEDERJA-148University of Malaga Universidad de Málaga/CBUA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic continues to cause a collapse in the health systems and econo-mies of many countries around the world, after 2 years of struggle and with the number of cases still growing exponentially. Health communication has become as essential and necessary for control of the pandemic as epidemiology. This bibliometric analysis identifies existing contributions, jointly studying health communication and the pandemic in scientific journals indexed. A systematic search of the Web of Science was performed, using keywords related to COVID-19 and health communication. Data extracted included the type of study, journal, number of citations, number of authors, country of publication, and study content. As the number of scientific investigations has grown, it is necessary to delve into the areas in which the most impactful publications have been generated. The results show that the scientific community has been quick to react by generating an extraordinary volume of publications. This review provides a comprehensive mapping of contributions to date, showing how research approaches have evolved in parallel with the pandemic. In 2020, concepts related to mental health, mass communication, misinformation and communication risk were more used. In 2021, vaccination, infodemic, risk perception, social distancing and telemedicine were the most prevalent keywords. By highlighting the main topics, authors, manuscripts and journals since the origin of COVID-19, the authors hope to disseminate information that can help researchers to identify subsisting knowledge gaps and a number of future research opportunities.

Indexed as

COVID-19Health CommunicationBibliometricsHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2bibliometric analysiscoronavirusCOVID-19health communication

Identifiers

PMID35162726
PMCPMC8834717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.