Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35162711›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Unpacking Cigar Product Familiarity and Terminology among Black and Hispanic Youth: It's All about Blunts.

Dawnyéa D Jackson, Emily C Sanders, Molly Barry, Dana E Wagner, Megan Wall Vigorita, Mario A Navarro

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Past-Year Blunt Smoking among Youth: Differences by LGBT and Non-LGBT Identity.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dawnyéa D JacksonRescue Agency, 660 Pennsylvania Avenue SE, Suite 400, Washington, DC 20003, USA.
Emily C SandersThe U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Tobacco Products, 10903 New Hampshire Avenue, Silver Spring, MD 20993, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1218-6119
Molly BarryRescue Agency, 660 Pennsylvania Avenue SE, Suite 400, Washington, DC 20003, USA.
Dana E WagnerRescue Agency, 660 Pennsylvania Avenue SE, Suite 400, Washington, DC 20003, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2015-4106
Megan Wall VigoritaThe U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Tobacco Products, 10903 New Hampshire Avenue, Silver Spring, MD 20993, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4433-921X
Mario A NavarroThe U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Tobacco Products, 10903 New Hampshire Avenue, Silver Spring, MD 20993, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1029-2209
United States Food and Drug Administration · US

Funding

United States Food and Drug Administration HHSF223201310001B
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prevalence rate of Cigar, Little Cigar, and Cigarillo (CLCC) use among youth rose above the rate of cigarettes for the first time in 2019, and Black and Hispanic youth remain disproportionately more susceptible and likely to use these products compared to White youth. Addressing this disparity through education requires a clearer understanding of the ways youth refer to, and group, CLCCs. Twenty-eight virtual focus groups with youth ages 13-17 (

Indexed as

CannabisTobacco ProductsAdolescentHispanic or LatinoHumansTobacco Usecigarilloscigarshealth communicationslittle cigarsmarijuanapublic healthterminologytobaccotobacco educationyouth

Identifiers

PMID35162711
PMCPMC8834713
OpenAlexW4210567815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.