Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35162673›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Social Bots' Involvement in the COVID-19 Vaccine Discussions on Twitter.

Menghan Zhang, Xue Qi, Ze Chen, Jun Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Social Bots' Role in the COVID-19 Pandemic Discussion on Twitter.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Menghan ZhangCentre for Chinese Urbanization Studies of Soochow University & Collaborative Innovation Center for New Urbanization and Social Governance of Universities, Suzhou 215006, China.
Xue QiSchool of Communication, Soochow University, Suzhou 215123, China.
Ze ChenSchool of Communication, Soochow University, Suzhou 215123, China.
Jun LiuDepartment of Communication, University of Copenhagen, DK-2300 Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-6066-4130

Funding

Major projects of Jiangsu Provincial Department of Education "Research on the Influence of Social Bots on the Climate of False Opinions in International Communication and its Regulation" 2021SJZDA151National Social Science Foundation Youth Project "Research on the Influence of Social bots on the Climate of False Opinions in International Communication" 21CXW028
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During the COVID-19 pandemic, social media served as an important channel for the public to obtain health information and disseminate opinions when offline communication was severely hindered. Yet the emergence of social bots influencing social media conversations about public health threats will require researchers and practitioners to develop new communication strategies considering their influence. So far, little is known as to what extent social bots have been involved in COVID-19 vaccine-related discussions and debates on social media. This work selected a period of nearly 9 months after the approval of the first COVID-19 vaccines to detect social bots and performed high-frequency word analysis for both social bot-generated and human-generated tweets, thus working out the extent to which social bots participated in the discussion on the COVID-19 vaccine on Twitter and their participation features. Then, a textual analysis was performed on the content of tweets. The findings revealed that 8.87% of the users were social bots, with 11% of tweets in the corpus. Besides, social bots remained active over three periods. High-frequency words in the discussions of social bots and human users on vaccine topics were similar within the three peaks of discourse.

Indexed as

COVID-19Social MediaCOVID-19 VaccinesHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2COVID-19 VaccinesCOVID-19 vaccinesocial botssocial media analyticstwitter

Identifiers

PMID35162673
PMCPMC8835429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.