Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35162586›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Patient Factors Associated with Different Hospice Programs in Korea: Analyzing Healthcare Big Data.

Young-Taek Park, Daekyun Kim, Su-Jin Koh, Yeon Sook Kim, Sang Mi Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Young-Taek ParkHIRA Research Institute, Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service (HIRA), Wonju 26465, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-7574-4165
Daekyun KimDepartment of Family Medicine, Incheon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Incheon 21431, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-8712-8394
Su-Jin KohDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Ulsan University Hospital, Ulsan University College of Medicine, Ulsan 44033, Korea.
Yeon Sook KimDepartment of Nursing, California State University San Bernardino, San Bernardino, CA 92407, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7368-7312
Sang Mi KimDepartment of Health Management, Jeonju University, Jeonju 55069, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-6657-3624

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Korean government has implemented a pilot project that introduces a new type of hospice care program called "Consultative Hospice Care" (COHC) since August 2017. The COHC is a new type of hospice program for terminally ill patients in acute care wards, which is different from the Independent Hospice Unit (IHU) care. This study aimed to compare the characteristics of two groups of hospice patients: COHC care only and both IHU care and COHC groups. Healthcare claim data from 1 April 2018 to 31 March 2020 were retrieved from the HIRA data warehouse system. The main outcome variable was patients receiving COHC only or both COHC and IHU care. The total number of hospice patients was 6482. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was used. Of 6482 hospice care recipients, 3789 (58.5%) received both COHC and IHU care. Those who received both COHC and IHU care were significantly associated with several factors: period from the first evaluation to death (adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 1.026; 95% confidence internal (CI), 1.024-1.029;

Indexed as

Hospice CareHospicesBig DataDelivery of Health CareHumansPilot ProjectsRepublic of Koreahospicehospice shared carehospice unitspalliative careterminal illness

Identifiers

PMID35162586
PMCPMC8834925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.