Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35162455›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Approaches Used to Describe, Measure, and Analyze Place of Practice in Dentistry, Medical, Nursing, and Allied Health Rural Graduate Workforce Research in Australia: A Systematic Scoping Review.

Hannah Beks, Sandra Walsh, Laura Alston, Martin Jones, Tony Smith, Darryl Maybery, Keith Sutton, Vincent L Versace

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Hannah BeksSchool of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong 3220, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2851-6450
Sandra WalshDepartment of Rural Health, University of South Australia, Whyalla 5608, Australia.
Laura AlstonSchool of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong 3220, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4551-8845
Martin JonesDepartment of Rural Health, University of South Australia, Whyalla 5608, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6463-3574
Tony SmithDepartment of Rural Health, University of Newcastle, Taree 2430, Australia.
Darryl MayberyDepartment of Rural Health & Indigenous Health, Monash University, Warragul 3820, Australia.
Keith SuttonDepartment of Rural Health & Indigenous Health, Monash University, Warragul 3820, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3233-2566
Vincent L VersaceSchool of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong 3220, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8514-1763

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Redressing the maldistribution of the health workforce in regional, rural, and remote geographical areas is a global issue and crucial to improving the accessibility of primary health care and specialist services. Geographical classification systems are important as they provide an objective and quantifiable measure of access and can have direct policy relevance, yet they are not always consistently applied in rural health research. It is unclear how research focusing on the graduate health workforce in Australia has described, measured, and analyzed place of practice. To examine approaches used, this review systematically scopes Australian rural studies focusing on dentistry, medicine, nursing, and allied health graduates that have included place of practice as an outcome measure. The Joanna Brigg's Institute Scoping Review Methodology was used to guide the review. Database searches retrieved 1130 unique citations, which were screened, resulting in 62 studies for inclusion. Included studies were observational, with most focusing on the practice locations of medical graduates and predicators of rural practice. Variations in the use of geographical classification approaches to define rurality were identified and included the use of systems that no longer have policy relevance, as well as adaptations of existing systems that make future comparisons between studies challenging. It is recommended that research examining the geographical distribution of the rural health workforce use uniform definitions of rurality that are aligned with current government policy.

Indexed as

Rural Health ServicesAustraliaCareer ChoiceDentistryHumansWorkforceallied health occupationsdentistryhealth economics and organizationshealth occupationshealth workforcemedicinenursingrural health

Identifiers

PMID35162455
PMCPMC8834932

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.