Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35162327›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Do Fitter Children Better Assess Their Physical Activity with Questionnaire Than Less Fit Children?

Jerneja Premelč, Kaja Meh, Henri Vähä-Ypyä, Vedrana Sember, Gregor Jurak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jerneja PremelčFaculty of Sport, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Kaja MehFaculty of Sport, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0002-2044-1255
Henri Vähä-YpyäUKK-Institute, 33500 Tampere, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-7537-2501
Vedrana SemberFaculty of Sport, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0001-7343-8626
Gregor JurakFaculty of Sport, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most physical activity (PA) questionnaires assess moderate to vigorous PA (MVPA) describing the physical exertion of individuals that might be influenced by their physical fitness. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine whether fitter children could better assess their PA with the questionnaire than less fit children. The cross-sectional validation study was conducted with 108 children (60 girls) aged 11 to 14 years, who were divided into three fitness groups based on the results of the 600 m running test. To answer the research question, the agreement between their assessment of PA using the SHAPES questionnaire and the UKK RM42 accelerometer data was analysed. One quarter of the participants achieved at least 60 min of MVPA each day, measured by accelerometer. The average MVPA obtained was 97.8 ± 35.6 min per day, with the high fitness group having a significantly higher value compared with the other groups. Moderate to high validity coefficients were found in the high fitness group (Spearman's ρ range 0.34-0.70). In contrast, the lower fitness groups had poor to moderate validity for all variables (Spearman's ρ range 0.03-0.42). These results suggest that the fittest children self-assess their PA with the questionnaire better than less fit children, which may advance new directions for the development and evaluation of PA questionnaires and their usability.

Indexed as

ExercisePhysical FitnessAccelerometryAdolescentChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and Questionnairesaccelerometerassessmentphysical fitnessreliabilityvalidityyouth

Identifiers

PMID35162327
PMCPMC8835444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.