Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35162092›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Friends with Benefits: The Positive Consequences of Pet-Friendly Practices for Workers' Well-Being.

Ana Junça-Silva

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. When Gig Work Gets Ruff: The Affective Benefits of Daily Human-Animal Interactions for Mental Health.International journal of psychology : Journal international de psychologie · 2026
    Article
  2. The Impact of Pet Videos on Emotional Face Processing.European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. How Guilt Drives Emotional Exhaustion in Work-Pet Family Conflict.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ana Junça-SilvaBusiness Research Unit, ISCTE-Lisbon University Institute, 1649-026 Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-6341-9771

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although there is evidence that pets may help individuals who are facing significant daily stressors, little is known about the benefits of pet-friendly practices for their owners' well-being. Based on the social exchange theory and on the Rusbult investment model, we argue that organizational pet-friendly practices will be viewed as a source of support from an organization that increases workers' organizational identification, which in turn will lead to higher levels of psychological well-being and life satisfaction. For this study, 208 working adults answered an online questionnaire. Results from the study showed that the more pet-friendly practices the higher the workers' organizational identification, which led to higher indices of psychological well-being and life satisfaction. This study contributes to a better understanding of the human-animal interaction and how pets can function as a resource for individuals' well-being at work.

Indexed as

FriendsPetsAnimalsHumansSurveys and Questionnairesorganizational identificationpet-friendly practicespets at workpsychological well-beingsubjective well-being

Identifiers

PMID35162092
PMCPMC8834589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.