Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35161964›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Indoor Location Data for Tracking Human Behaviours: A Scoping Review.

Leia C Shum, Reza Faieghi, Terry Borsook, Tamim Faruk, Souraiya Kassam, Hoda Nabavi, Sofija Spasojevic, James Tung, Shehroz S Khan, Andrea Iaboni

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Leia C ShumKITE-Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON M5G 2A2, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8464-3403
Reza FaieghiKITE-Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON M5G 2A2, Canada.
Terry BorsookKITE-Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON M5G 2A2, Canada.
Tamim FarukKITE-Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON M5G 2A2, Canada.
Souraiya KassamKITE-Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON M5G 2A2, Canada.
Hoda NabaviKITE-Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON M5G 2A2, Canada.
Sofija SpasojevicKITE-Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON M5G 2A2, Canada.
James TungDepartment of Mechanical and Mechatronics Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada.
Shehroz S KhanKITE-Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON M5G 2A2, Canada.
Andrea IaboniKITE-Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON M5G 2A2, Canada.

Funding

AGE-WELL NCE AWCRP-2020-02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Real-time location systems (RTLS) record locations of individuals over time and are valuable sources of spatiotemporal data that can be used to understand patterns of human behaviour. Location data are used in a wide breadth of applications, from locating individuals to contact tracing or monitoring health markers. To support the use of RTLS in many applications, the varied ways location data can describe patterns of human behaviour should be examined. The objective of this review is to investigate behaviours described using indoor location data, and particularly the types of features extracted from RTLS data to describe behaviours. Four major applications were identified: health status monitoring, consumer behaviours, developmental behaviour, and workplace safety/efficiency. RTLS data features used to analyse behaviours were categorized into four groups: dwell time, activity level, trajectory, and proximity. Passive sensors that provide non-uniform data streams and features with lower complexity were common. Few studies analysed social behaviours between more than one individual at once. Less than half the health status monitoring studies examined clinical validity against gold-standard measures. Overall, spatiotemporal data from RTLS technologies are useful to identify behaviour patterns, provided there is sufficient richness in location data, the behaviour of interest is well-characterized, and a detailed feature analysis is undertaken.

Indexed as

Computer SystemsContact TracingHumanscomputational intelligencedata analyticsdigital phenotypinghealth monitoring technologieshuman behaviourreal-time location systemssensor-based assessments

Identifiers

PMID35161964
PMCPMC8839091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.