Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35161862›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Putting Temperature into the Equation: Development and Validation of Algorithms to Distinguish Non-Wearing from Inactivity and Sleep in Wearable Sensors.

Sara Pagnamenta, Karoline Blix Grønvik, Kamiar Aminian, Beatrix Vereijken, Anisoara Paraschiv-Ionescu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Advancing Digital Medicine with Wearables in the Wild.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sara PagnamentaEcole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne (EPFL), Laboratory of Movement Analysis and Measurement (LMAM), CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-9703-380X
Karoline Blix GrønvikDepartment of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, N-7491 Trondheim, Norway.
Kamiar AminianEcole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne (EPFL), Laboratory of Movement Analysis and Measurement (LMAM), CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-6582-5375
Beatrix VereijkenDepartment of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, N-7491 Trondheim, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-2231-8138
Anisoara Paraschiv-IonescuEcole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne (EPFL), Laboratory of Movement Analysis and Measurement (LMAM), CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.
École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne · CHNorwegian University of Science and Technology · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Long-term monitoring of real-life physical activity (PA) using wearable devices is increasingly used in clinical and epidemiological studies. The quality of the recorded data is an important issue, as unreliable data may negatively affect the outcome measures. A potential source of bias in PA assessment is the non-wearing of a device during the expected monitoring period. Identification of non-wear time is usually performed as a pre-processing step using data recorded by the accelerometer, which is the most common sensor used for PA analysis algorithms. The main issue is the correct differentiation between non-wear time, sleep time, and sedentary wake time, especially in frail older adults or patient groups. Based on the current state of the art, the objectives of this study were to (1) develop robust non-wearing detection algorithms based on data recorded with a wearable device that integrates acceleration and temperature sensors; (2) validate the algorithms using real-world data recorded according to an appropriate measurement protocol. A comparative evaluation of the implemented algorithms indicated better performances (99%, 97%, 99%, and 98% for sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and negative predictive value, respectively) for an event-based detection algorithm, where the temperature sensor signal was appropriately processed to identify the timing of device removal/non-wear.

Indexed as

Sedentary BehaviorWearable Electronic DevicesAgedAlgorithmsHumansSleepTemperatureaccelerometeractivity monitoringevent-based detection algorithmsnon-wearing timetemperature sensorwearable devices

Identifiers

PMID35161862
PMCPMC8838557
OpenAlexW4210330582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.