Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35161837›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Data-Driven Techniques for Low-Cost Sensor Selection and Calibration for the Use Case of Air Quality Monitoring.

Rameez Raja Kureshi, Bhupesh Kumar Mishra, Dhavalkumar Thakker, Reena John, Adrian Walker, Sydney Simpson, Neel Thakkar, Agot Kirsten Wante

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Rameez Raja KureshiFaculty of Engineering and Informatics, University of Bradford, Bradford BD7 1DP, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2021-8053
Bhupesh Kumar MishraFaculty of Engineering and Informatics, University of Bradford, Bradford BD7 1DP, UK.
Dhavalkumar ThakkerFaculty of Engineering and Informatics, University of Bradford, Bradford BD7 1DP, UK.
Reena JohnFaculty of Engineering and Informatics, University of Bradford, Bradford BD7 1DP, UK.
Adrian WalkerCity of Bradford Metropolitan District Council, Bradford BD1 1HX, UK.
Sydney SimpsonCity of Bradford Metropolitan District Council, Bradford BD1 1HX, UK.
Neel ThakkarIBM India Pvt Ltd., Kolkata 700156, India.
Agot Kirsten WanteIVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute, 114 28 Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the emergence of Low-Cost Sensor (LCS) devices, measuring real-time data on a large scale has become a feasible alternative approach to more costly devices. Over the years, sensor technologies have evolved which has provided the opportunity to have diversity in LCS selection for the same task. However, this diversity in sensor types adds complexity to appropriate sensor selection for monitoring tasks. In addition, LCS devices are often associated with low confidence in terms of sensing accuracy because of the complexities in sensing principles and the interpretation of monitored data. From the data analytics point of view, data quality is a major concern as low-quality data more often leads to low confidence in the monitoring systems. Therefore, any applications on building monitoring systems using LCS devices need to focus on two main techniques: sensor selection and calibration to improve data quality. In this paper, data-driven techniques were presented for sensor calibration techniques. To validate our methodology and techniques, an air quality monitoring case study from the Bradford district, UK, as part of two European Union (EU) funded projects was used. For this case study, the candidate sensors were selected based on the literature and market availability. The candidate sensors were narrowed down into the selected sensors after analysing their consistency. To address data quality issues, four different calibration methods were compared to derive the best-suited calibration method for the LCS devices in our use case system. In the calibration, meteorological parameters temperature and humidity were used in addition to the observed readings. Moreover, we uniquely considered Absolute Humidity (

Indexed as

Air PollutantsAir PollutionCalibrationEnvironmental MonitoringParticulate MatterAir PollutantsParticulate Matterair qualitycalibrationdata-driven techniquesdrift analysisLow-Cost Sensor (LCS)

Identifiers

PMID35161837
PMCPMC8839978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.