ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Improving SDG Classification Precision Using Combinatorial Fusion.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Combinatorial fusion algorithm (CFA) is a machine learning and artificial intelligence (ML/AI) framework for combining multiple scoring systems using the rank-score characteristic (RSC) function and cognitive diversity (CD). When measuring the relevance of a publication or document with respect to the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) of the United Nations, a classification scheme is used. However, this classification process is a challenging task due to the overlapping goals and contextual differences of those diverse SDGs. In this paper, we use CFA to combine a topic model classifier (Model A) and a semantic link classifier (Model B) to improve the precision of the classification process. We characterize and analyze each of the individual models using the RSC function and CD between Models A and B. We evaluate the classification results from combining the models using a score combination and a rank combination, when compared to the results obtained from human experts. In summary, we demonstrate that the combination of Models A and B can improve classification precision only if these individual models perform well and are diverse.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.