Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35161796›Full record

SynthesisSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Quantification of Movement in Stroke Patients under Free Living Conditions Using Wearable Sensors: A Systematic Review.

Mariano Bernaldo de Quirós, E H Douma, Inge van den Akker-Scheek, Claudine J C Lamoth, Natasha M Maurits

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mariano Bernaldo de QuirósDepartment of Neurology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands.
E H DoumaDepartment of Human Movement Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands.
Inge van den Akker-ScheekDepartment of Orthopedics, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1614-8419
Claudine J C LamothDepartment of Human Movement Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands.
Natasha M MauritsDepartment of Neurology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6231-7044

Funding

InterReg V-A programma Nederland-Deutschland NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stroke is a main cause of long-term disability worldwide, placing a large burden on individuals and health care systems. Wearable technology can potentially objectively assess and monitor patients outside clinical environments, enabling a more detailed evaluation of their impairment and allowing individualization of rehabilitation therapies. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of setups used in literature to measure movement of stroke patients under free living conditions using wearable sensors, and to evaluate the relation between such sensor-based outcomes and the level of functioning as assessed by existing clinical evaluation methods. After a systematic search we included 32 articles, totaling 1076 stroke patients from acute to chronic phases and 236 healthy controls. We summarized the results by type and location of sensors, and by sensor-based outcome measures and their relation with existing clinical evaluation tools. We conclude that sensor-based measures of movement provide additional information in relation to clinical evaluation tools assessing motor functioning and both are needed to gain better insight in patient behavior and recovery. However, there is a strong need for standardization and consensus, regarding clinical assessments, but also regarding the use of specific algorithms and metrics for unsupervised measurements during daily life.

Indexed as

StrokeWearable Electronic DevicesAlgorithmsHumansMovementSocial Conditionsactivities of daily livingcontinuous monitoringmovement quantificationstrokewearables

Identifiers

PMID35161796
PMCPMC8840016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.