Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35161758›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Condition Monitoring of Railway Crossing Geometry via Measured and Simulated Track Responses.

Marko D G Milosevic, Björn A Pålsson, Arne Nissen, Jens C O Nielsen, Håkan Johansson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Marko D G MilosevicDepartment of Mechanics and Maritime Sciences/CHARMEC, Chalmers University of Technology, 412 96 Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-1928-7470
Björn A PålssonDepartment of Mechanics and Maritime Sciences/CHARMEC, Chalmers University of Technology, 412 96 Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-2237-8560
Arne NissenThe Swedish Transport Administration, P.O. Box 809, 971 25 Luleå, Sweden.
Jens C O NielsenDepartment of Mechanics and Maritime Sciences/CHARMEC, Chalmers University of Technology, 412 96 Gothenburg, Sweden.
Håkan JohanssonDepartment of Mechanics and Maritime Sciences/CHARMEC, Chalmers University of Technology, 412 96 Gothenburg, Sweden.

Funding

the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme in the project In2Track2 No 826255
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper presents methods for continuous condition monitoring of railway switches and crossings (S&C, turnout) via sleeper-mounted accelerometers at the crossing transition. The methods are developed from concurrently measured sleeper accelerations and scanned crossing geometries from six in situ crossing panels. These measurements combined with a multi-body simulation (MBS) model with a structural track model and implemented scanned crossing geometries are used to derive the link between the crossing geometry condition and the resulting track excitation. From this analysis, a crossing condition indicator Cλ1-λ2, γ is proposed. The indicator is defined as the root mean square (RMS) of a track response signal

Indexed as

RailroadsAccelerationCalibrationComputer Simulation3D scanaccelerometercondition indicatorcondition monitoringcrossing geometrymulti-body simulationsrailway

Identifiers

PMID35161758
PMCPMC8838570

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.