Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35161664›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

A Shallow U-Net Architecture for Reliably Predicting Blood Pressure (BP) from Photoplethysmogram (PPG) and Electrocardiogram (ECG) Signals.

Sakib Mahmud, Nabil Ibtehaz, Amith Khandakar, Anas M Tahir, Tawsifur Rahman, Khandaker Reajul Islam, Md Shafayet Hossain, M Sohel Rahman, Farayi Musharavati, Mohamed Arselene Ayari and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Sakib MahmudDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Qatar University, Doha P.O. Box 2713, Qatar.ORCID 0000-0002-4599-2192
Nabil IbtehazDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Qatar University, Doha P.O. Box 2713, Qatar.
Amith KhandakarDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Qatar University, Doha P.O. Box 2713, Qatar.ORCID 0000-0001-7068-9112
Anas M TahirDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Qatar University, Doha P.O. Box 2713, Qatar.
Tawsifur RahmanDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Qatar University, Doha P.O. Box 2713, Qatar.
Khandaker Reajul IslamDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Qatar University, Doha P.O. Box 2713, Qatar.
Md Shafayet HossainDepartment of Electrical, Electronics and Systems Engineering, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi 43600, Selangor, Malaysia.
M Sohel RahmanDepartment of CSE, BUET, ECE Building, West Palashi, Dhaka 1205, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0001-9419-6478
Farayi MusharavatiDepartment Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Qatar University, Doha P.O. Box 2713, Qatar.ORCID 0000-0003-0489-0090
Mohamed Arselene AyariDepartment of Civil and Architectural Engineering, Qatar University, Doha P.O. Box 2713, Qatar.ORCID 0000-0002-8663-886X
Mohammad Tariqul IslamDepartment of Electrical, Electronics and Systems Engineering, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi 43600, Selangor, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-4929-3209
Muhammad E H ChowdhuryDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Qatar University, Doha P.O. Box 2713, Qatar.ORCID 0000-0003-0744-8206

Funding

International Research Collaboration Co-Fund (IRCC) IRCC-2021-001Qatar National Research Fund NPRP12S-0227-190164
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiovascular diseases are the most common causes of death around the world. To detect and treat heart-related diseases, continuous blood pressure (BP) monitoring along with many other parameters are required. Several invasive and non-invasive methods have been developed for this purpose. Most existing methods used in hospitals for continuous monitoring of BP are invasive. On the contrary, cuff-based BP monitoring methods, which can predict systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP), cannot be used for continuous monitoring. Several studies attempted to predict BP from non-invasively collectible signals such as photoplethysmograms (PPG) and electrocardiograms (ECG), which can be used for continuous monitoring. In this study, we explored the applicability of autoencoders in predicting BP from PPG and ECG signals. The investigation was carried out on 12,000 instances of 942 patients of the MIMIC-II dataset, and it was found that a very shallow, one-dimensional autoencoder can extract the relevant features to predict the SBP and DBP with state-of-the-art performance on a very large dataset. An independent test set from a portion of the MIMIC-II dataset provided a mean absolute error (MAE) of 2.333 and 0.713 for SBP and DBP, respectively. On an external dataset of 40 subjects, the model trained on the MIMIC-II dataset provided an MAE of 2.728 and 1.166 for SBP and DBP, respectively. For both the cases, the results met British Hypertension Society (BHS) Grade A and surpassed the studies from the current literature.

Indexed as

HypertensionPhotoplethysmographyBlood PressureBlood Pressure DeterminationElectrocardiographyHumansarterial blood pressureautoencoderdiastolic blood pressureelectrocardiogramfeature extractionphotoplethysmogramsystolic blood pressure

Identifiers

PMID35161664
PMCPMC8840244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.