Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35161502›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Anomaly Detection Framework for Wearables Data: A Perspective Review on Data Concepts, Data Analysis Algorithms and Prospects.

Jithin S Sunny, C Pawan K Patro, Khushi Karnani, Sandeep C Pingle, Feng Lin, Misa Anekoji, Lawrence D Jones, Santosh Kesari, Shashaanka Ashili

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Evaporative microclimate interval cooling reduces heat stress in thermal insulating protective clothing.Journal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England) · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Aligned bodies, united hearts: embodied emotional dynamics of an Islamic ritual.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Hyperparameter optimization for cardiovascular disease data-driven prognostic system.Visual computing for industry, biomedicine, and art · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jithin S SunnyRhenix Lifesciences, Hyderabad 500038, India.ORCID 0000-0002-8811-3565
C Pawan K PatroCureScience, San Diego, CA 92121, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6838-2533
Khushi KarnaniRhenix Lifesciences, Hyderabad 500038, India.
Sandeep C PingleCureScience, San Diego, CA 92121, USA.
Feng LinCureScience, San Diego, CA 92121, USA.
Misa AnekojiCureScience, San Diego, CA 92121, USA.
Lawrence D JonesCureScience, San Diego, CA 92121, USA.
Santosh KesariPacific Neuroscience Institute, Providence Saint John's Health Center, Santa Monica, CA 90404, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3772-6000
Shashaanka AshiliCureScience, San Diego, CA 92121, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6335-0954
Saint John's Health Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wearable devices use sensors to evaluate physiological parameters, such as the heart rate, pulse rate, number of steps taken, body fat and diet. The continuous monitoring of physiological parameters offers a potential solution to assess personal healthcare. Identifying outliers or anomalies in heart rates and other features can help identify patterns that can play a significant role in understanding the underlying cause of disease states. Since anomalies are present within the vast amount of data generated by wearable device sensors, identifying anomalies requires accurate automated techniques. Given the clinical significance of anomalies and their impact on diagnosis and treatment, a wide range of detection methods have been proposed to detect anomalies. Much of what is reported herein is based on previously published literature. Clinical studies employing wearable devices are also increasing. In this article, we review the nature of the wearables-associated data and the downstream processing methods for detecting anomalies. In addition, we also review supervised and un-supervised techniques as well as semi-supervised methods that overcome the challenges of missing and un-annotated healthcare data.

Indexed as

Data AnalysisWearable Electronic DevicesAlgorithmsHeart Rateanomaly detectionheart ratemachine learningmissing datawearables

Identifiers

PMID35161502
PMCPMC8840097
OpenAlexW4205176606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.