Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35161456›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Predicting Attack Pattern via Machine Learning by Exploiting Stateful Firewall as Virtual Network Function in an SDN Network.

Senthil Prabakaran, Ramalakshmi Ramar, Irshad Hussain, Balasubramanian Prabhu Kavin, Sultan S Alshamrani, Ahmed Saeed AlGhamdi, Abdullah Alshehri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Senthil PrabakaranDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Karpagam College of Engineering, Coimbatore 641032, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID 0000-0002-6766-1749
Ramalakshmi RamarDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Kalasalingam Academy of Research and Education, Krishnankoil 626126, Tamil Nadu, India.
Irshad HussainFaculty of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology, Peshawar 25000, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0001-9103-1803
Balasubramanian Prabhu KavinSri Ramachandra Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Porur, Chennai 600116, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID 0000-0001-6939-4683
Sultan S AlshamraniDepartment of Information Technology, College of Computer and Information Technology, Taif University, P.O. Box 11099, Taif 21944, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-8194-9354
Ahmed Saeed AlGhamdiDepartment of Computer Engineering, College of Computer and Information Technology, Taif University, P.O. Box 11099, Taif 21944, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-9165-7600
Abdullah AlshehriDepartment of Information Technology, Al Baha University, P.O. Box 1988, Al Baha 65431, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-0008-9394

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Decoupled data and control planes in Software Defined Networks (SDN) allow them to handle an increasing number of threats by limiting harmful network links at the switching stage. As storage, high-end servers, and network devices, Network Function Virtualization (NFV) is designed to replace purpose-built network elements with VNFs (Virtualized Network Functions). A Software Defined Network Function Virtualization (SDNFV) network is designed in this paper to boost network performance. Stateful firewall services are deployed as VNFs in the SDN network in this article to offer security and boost network scalability. The SDN controller's role is to develop a set of guidelines and rules to avoid hazardous network connectivity. Intruder assaults that employ numerous socket addresses cannot be adequately protected by these strategies. Machine learning algorithms are trained using traditional network threat intelligence data to identify potentially malicious linkages and probable attack targets. Based on conventional network data (DT), Bayesian Network (BayesNet), Naive-Bayes, C4.5, and Decision Table (DT) algorithms are used to predict the target host that will be attacked. The experimental results shows that the Bayesian Network algorithm achieved an average prediction accuracy of 92.87%, Native-Bayes Algorithm achieved an average prediction accuracy of 87.81%, C4.5 Algorithm achieved an average prediction accuracy of 84.92%, and the Decision Tree algorithm achieved an average prediction accuracy of 83.18%. There were 451 k login attempts from 178 different countries, with over 70 k source IP addresses and 40 k source port addresses recorded in a large dataset from nine honeypot servers.

Indexed as

attack predictionbayesian networkdecision tablefirewallmachine learningnetwork function virtualizationSDNFVsoftware defined network

Identifiers

PMID35161456
PMCPMC8839531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.