Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35161417›Full record

ArticlePlants (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Extracts from Environmental Strains of

Valentina Librizzi, Antonino Malacrinò, Maria Giulia Li Destri Nicosia, Nataly Barger, Tal Luzzatto-Knaan, Sonia Pangallo, Giovanni E Agosteo, Leonardo Schena

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. EndophyticPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. The IsolatePlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Frontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Valentina LibrizziDepartment Agraria, University of Reggio Calabria, 89122 Reggio Calabria, Italy.
Antonino MalacrinòDepartment Agraria, University of Reggio Calabria, 89122 Reggio Calabria, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0811-1229
Maria Giulia Li Destri NicosiaDepartment Agraria, University of Reggio Calabria, 89122 Reggio Calabria, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5201-0057
Nataly BargerDepartment of Marine Biology, Leon H. Charney School of Marine Sciences, University of Haifa, Haifa 3498838, Israel.
Tal Luzzatto-KnaanDepartment of Marine Biology, Leon H. Charney School of Marine Sciences, University of Haifa, Haifa 3498838, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-8392-0501
Sonia PangalloDepartment Agraria, University of Reggio Calabria, 89122 Reggio Calabria, Italy.
Giovanni E AgosteoDepartment Agraria, University of Reggio Calabria, 89122 Reggio Calabria, Italy.
Leonardo SchenaDepartment Agraria, University of Reggio Calabria, 89122 Reggio Calabria, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9737-2593
University of Reggio Calabria · ITUniversity of Haifa · IL

Funding

Ministry of Education, Universities and Research PON03PE_00090_02Ministry of Education, Universities and Research PON03PE_00090_03
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of synthetic chemical products in agriculture is causing severe damage to the environment and human health, but agrochemicals are still widely used to protect our crops. To counteract this trend, we have been looking for alternative strategies to control plant diseases without causing harm to the environment or damage to our health. However, these alternatives are still far from completely replacing chemical products. Microorganisms have been widely known as a biological tool to control plant diseases, but their use is still limited due to the high variability in their efficacy, together with issues in product registration. However, the metabolites produced by these microorganisms can represent a novel tool for the environment-friendly management of plant diseases, while reducing the issues mentioned above. In this study, we explore the soil microbial diversity in natural systems to look for microorganisms with the potential to be used in pre- and post-harvest protection against fungal plant pathogens. Using a simple workflow, we isolated 22 bacterial strains that were tested both in vitro and in vivo for their ability to counteract the growth of common plant pathogens. The three best isolates, identified as members of the bacterial genus

Indexed as

AlternariaBotrytisColletotrichumMoniliniaPenicilliumpost-harvest diseases

Identifiers

PMID35161417
PMCPMC8840005
OpenAlexW4210670774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.