Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35161338›Full record

ReviewPlants (Basel, Switzerland)2022

A Review of the Developmental Processes and Selective Pressures Shaping Aperture Pattern in Angiosperms.

Beatrice Albert, Alexis Matamoro-Vidal, Charlotte Prieu, Sophie Nadot, Irène Till-Bottraud, Adrienne Ressayre, Pierre-Henri Gouyon

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Ecology and evolution · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Beatrice AlbertCNRS, AgroParisTech, Ecologie Systématique et Evolution, Université Paris-Saclay, 91405 Orsay, France.
Alexis Matamoro-VidalCNRS, AgroParisTech, Ecologie Systématique et Evolution, Université Paris-Saclay, 91405 Orsay, France.
Charlotte PrieuCNRS, AgroParisTech, Ecologie Systématique et Evolution, Université Paris-Saclay, 91405 Orsay, France.
Sophie NadotCNRS, AgroParisTech, Ecologie Systématique et Evolution, Université Paris-Saclay, 91405 Orsay, France.ORCID 0000-0001-7521-8950
Irène Till-BottraudCNRS, GEOLAB, Université Clermont Auvergne, 91405 Clermont-Ferrand, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0886-751X
Adrienne RessayreINRAE, CNRS, AgroParisTech, Génétique Quantitative et Evolution-Le Moulon, Université Paris-Saclay, 91190 Gif-sur-Yvette, France.ORCID 0000-0003-0097-3331
Pierre-Henri GouyonMuséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, CNRS, Institut de Systématique, Évolution, Biodiversité, Sorbonne Université, 75006 Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0003-1954-4553

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pollen grains of flowering plants display a fascinating diversity of forms. The observed diversity is determined by the developmental mechanisms involved in the establishment of pollen morphological features. Pollen grains are generally surrounded by an extremely resistant wall displaying apertures that play a key role in reproduction, being the places at which pollen tube growth is initiated. Aperture number, structure, and position (collectively termed 'aperture pattern') are determined during microsporogenesis, which is the earliest step of pollen ontogeny. Here, we review current knowledge about aperture pattern developmental mechanisms and adaptive significance with respect to plant reproduction and how advances in these fields shed light on our understanding of aperture pattern evolution in angiosperms.

Indexed as

aperture patterncytokinesisevo-devomicrosporogenesispollen

Identifiers

PMID35161338
PMCPMC8840023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.