Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35161065›Full record

ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Innovative Concepts and Recent Breakthrough for Engineered Graft and Constructs for Bone Regeneration: A Literature Systematic Review.

Francesco Inchingolo, Denisa Hazballa, Alessio Danilo Inchingolo, Giuseppina Malcangi, Grazia Marinelli, Antonio Mancini, Maria Elena Maggiore, Ioana Roxana Bordea, Antonio Scarano, Marco Farronato and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
15.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Laser Surgical Approach of Upper Labial Frenulum: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Retrospective Descriptive Case Series on the Use of AMCOPBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Bone Grafts: Everything You Need to Know.Journal of periodontal research · 2026
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Comparative Evaluation of Hyaluronic Acid (hyaDENT BGJournal of functional biomaterials · 2025
    Article

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Francesco InchingoloDepartment of Interdisciplinary Medicine, University of Medicine Aldo Moro, 70124 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3797-5883
Denisa HazballaDepartment of Interdisciplinary Medicine, University of Medicine Aldo Moro, 70124 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8160-3342
Alessio Danilo InchingoloDepartment of Interdisciplinary Medicine, University of Medicine Aldo Moro, 70124 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6366-1039
Giuseppina MalcangiDepartment of Interdisciplinary Medicine, University of Medicine Aldo Moro, 70124 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9745-7506
Grazia MarinelliDepartment of Interdisciplinary Medicine, University of Medicine Aldo Moro, 70124 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9163-2350
Antonio ManciniDepartment of Interdisciplinary Medicine, University of Medicine Aldo Moro, 70124 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7103-4086
Maria Elena MaggioreDepartment of Interdisciplinary Medicine, University of Medicine Aldo Moro, 70124 Bari, Italy.
Ioana Roxana BordeaDepartment of Oral Rehabilitation, Faculty of Dentistry, Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400012 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-7166-9949
Antonio ScaranoDepartment of Innovative Technologies in Medicine and Dentistry, University of Chieti-Pescara, 66100 Chieti, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1374-6146
Marco FarronatoUOC Maxillo-Facial Surgery and Dentistry, Department of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, School of Dentistry, Fondazione IRCCS Ca Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, University of Milan, 20100 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6209-9873
Gianluca Martino TartagliaUOC Maxillo-Facial Surgery and Dentistry, Department of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, School of Dentistry, Fondazione IRCCS Ca Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, University of Milan, 20100 Milan, Italy.
Felice LorussoDepartment of Innovative Technologies in Medicine and Dentistry, University of Chieti-Pescara, 66100 Chieti, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2660-9231
Angelo Michele InchingoloDepartment of Interdisciplinary Medicine, University of Medicine Aldo Moro, 70124 Bari, Italy.
Gianna DipalmaDepartment of Interdisciplinary Medicine, University of Medicine Aldo Moro, 70124 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5947-8987
University of Bari Aldo Moro · ITUniversity of Chieti-Pescara · ITUniversity of Milan · ITIuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy · ROUniversity of Elbasan · AL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFor decades, regenerative medicine and dentistry have been improved with new therapies and innovative clinical protocols. The aim of the present investigation was to evaluate through a critical review the recent innovations in the field of bone regeneration with a focus on the healing potentials and clinical protocols of bone substitutes combined with engineered constructs, growth factors and photobiomodulation applications.

methodsA Boolean systematic search was conducted by PubMed/Medline, PubMed/Central, Web of Science and Google scholar databases according to the PRISMA guidelines.

resultsAfter the initial screening, a total of 304 papers were considered eligible for the qualitative synthesis. The articles included were categorized according to the main topics: alloplastic bone substitutes, autologous teeth derived substitutes, xenografts, platelet-derived concentrates, laser therapy, microbiota and bone metabolism and mesenchymal cells construct.

conclusionsThe effectiveness of the present investigation showed that the use of biocompatible and bio-resorbable bone substitutes are related to the high-predictability of the bone regeneration protocols, while the oral microbiota and systemic health of the patient produce a clinical advantage for the long-term success of the regeneration procedures and implant-supported restorations. The use of growth factors is able to reduce the co-morbidity of the regenerative procedure ameliorating the post-operative healing phase. The LLLT is an adjuvant protocol to improve the soft and hard tissues response for bone regeneration treatment protocols.

Indexed as

APAGautologous teeth bone substitutebio-ceramicsbone substitutesCGFgraftlow level laser therapyplatelet derivates growth factorsPRFPRPscaffold

Identifiers

PMID35161065
PMCPMC8839672
OpenAlexW4210257465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.