ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Prosthetic Materials Used for Implant-Supported Restorations and Their Biochemical Oral Interactions: A Narrative Review.
Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Peri-implant soft tissue conditioning of immediate posterior implants by CAD-CAM socket sealing abutments: a randomized clinical trial.BMC oral health · 2025Trial
- Biomechanical Behavior of Different Framework and Superstructure Material Combinations in Two-Implant-Supported Four-Unit Prostheses: A Dynamic Finite Element Analysis.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Influence of Framework Material on Stress, Fatigue, and Stability of "All-on-Four" System Components-Biomechanical Evaluation with Finite Element Analysis.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- Antibacterial Properties of Quercetin-Curcumin-Modified PMMA Denture Base Resin for Oral Surgical Site Applications: An In Vitro Study.International journal of dentistry · 2026Article
- A prospective randomized split-mouth trial comparing immediate versus early anterior implant placement with customized healing abutments: 12-month marginal bone loss, stability, and esthetic outcome.Frontiers in dental medicine · 2026Article
- Influence of Abutment Geometry on Zirconia Crown Retention: An In Vitro Study.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Article
- The Applications of 3D-Printing Technology in Prosthodontics: A Review of the Current Literature.Cureus · 2024Review
- The Contribution of Scanning Force Microscopy on Dental Research: A Narrative Review.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Exploring the Impact of Copper Oxide Substitution on Structure, Morphology, Bioactivity, and Electrical Properties of 45S5 BioglassBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Impact of Prosthetic Material and Restoration Type on Peri-Implant Bone Resorption: A Retrospective Analysis in a Romanian Sample.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- In Vitro Degradation of Mg-Doped ZrOMaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Biomaterials and Clinical Applications of Customized Healing Abutment-A Narrative Review.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2022Review
- Workflow for the full-mouth rehabilitation of a patient with different prosthetic materials in opposing arches: A bold move in desperate scenario.Journal of advanced pharmaceutical technology & research · 2022Article
- Biocompatibility and Surface Roughness of Different Sustainable Dental Composite Blocks: Comprehensive In Vitro Study.ACS omega · 2022Article
- Recent Advancements in Materials and Coatings for Biomedical Implants.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Is There a Better Biomaterial for Dental Implants than Titanium?-A Review and Meta-Study Analysis.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2022Review
- Tribological and Antibacterial Properties of Polyetheretherketone Composites with Black Phosphorus Nanosheets.Polymers · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to outline relevant elements regarding the biochemical interactions between prosthetic materials used for obtaining implant-supported restorations and the oral environment. Implant-supported prostheses have seen unprecedented development in recent years, benefiting from the emergence of both new prosthetic materials (with increased biocompatibility and very good mechanical behavior), and computerized manufacturing technologies, which offer predictability, accuracy, and reproducibility. On the other hand, the quality of conventional materials for obtaining implant-supported prostheses is acknowledged, as they have already proven their clinical performance. The properties of PMMA (poly (methyl methacrylate))-which is a representative interim material frequently used in prosthodontics-and of PEEK (polyether ether ketone)-a biomaterial which is placed on the border between interim and final prosthetic use-are highlighted in order to illustrate the complex way these materials interact with the oral environment. In regard to definitive prosthetic materials used for obtaining implant-supported prostheses, emphasis is placed on zirconia-based ceramics. Zirconia exhibits several distinctive advantages (excellent aesthetics, good mechanical behavior, biocompatibility), through which its clinical applicability has become increasingly wide. Zirconia's interaction with the oral environment (fibroblasts, osteoblasts, dental pulp cells, macrophages) is presented in a relevant synthesis, thus revealing its good biocompatibility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.