Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35160876›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Influence of Selected Ophthalmic Fluids on the Wettability and Hydration of Hydrogel and Silicone Hydrogel Contact Lenses-In Vitro Study.

Gabriela Chwalik-Pilszyk, Anna Wiśniewska

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. [Visual Performance of School-age Children Wearing Dual-Focus Soft Contact Lenses: A Randomized Controlled Trial].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2024
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Evaluating the initial and end-of-day wettability of contemporary daily disposable contact lenses using various in vitro methods.Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Methodology for characterizing the printability of hydrogels.International journal of bioprinting · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Gabriela Chwalik-PilszykDepartment of Applied Mechanics and Biomechanics, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Tadeusz Kosciuszko Cracow University of Technology, 37 Jana Pawla II Av., 31-864 Cracow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-7053-5356
Anna WiśniewskaDepartment of Applied Mechanics and Biomechanics, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Tadeusz Kosciuszko Cracow University of Technology, 37 Jana Pawla II Av., 31-864 Cracow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-1025-4958

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study attempts to evaluate the effect of incubation in selected ophthalmic fluids on contact lenses (Etafilcon A, Omafilcon A, Narafilcon A, Senofilcon A). Four research groups differing in the incubation environment were created: (1) initial state, (2) contact lens solution (CLS), (3) contact lens solution and eye drops (ED) and (4) eye drops. Dehydration by gravimetric method and the contact angle (CA) by the sessile drop method were tested. The surface free energy (SFE) was also calculated with the use of several methods: Owens-Wendt, Wu, Neumann, and Neumann-Kwok. The greatest changes in the dehydration profile were observed for contact lenses incubated in ED. The most noticeable changes in CA values were observed for contact lenses incubated in ED, in which it was not possible to settle water drop after incubation. On the basis of SFE analysis, higher values were found for hydrogel contact lenses, e.g., according to the Owens-Wendt method, they ranged from 54.45 ± 6.56 mJ/m2 to 58.09 ± 4.86 mJ/m2, while in the case of silicone-hydrogel contact lenses, they ranged from 32.86 ± 3.47 mJ/m2 to 35.33 ± 6.56 mJ/m2. Incubation in all tested environments decreased the SFE values, but the differences were in most cases statistically insignificant. Calculating the SFE may be a useful method as it can be used to estimate the possibility of bacteria adhering to contact lens surfaces.

Indexed as

contact angle (CA)contact lensesdehydrationsurface free energy (SFE)wettability

Identifiers

PMID35160876
PMCPMC8839750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.