Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35160593›Full record

ReviewPolymers2022

Action of Mechanical Forces on Polymerization and Polymers.

Anatoly T Ponomarenko, Alexey R Tameev, Vitaliy G Shevchenko

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Polymers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Soft robotic patterning of liquids.Scientific reports · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anatoly T PonomarenkoEnikolopov Institute of Synthetic Polymeric Materials, Russian Academy of Sciences, 70 Profsoyuznaya, 117393 Moscow, Russia.
Alexey R TameevFrumkin Institute of Physical Chemistry and Electrochemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, 31, bld. 4 Leninsky Prospect, 119071 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-8865-3361
Vitaliy G ShevchenkoEnikolopov Institute of Synthetic Polymeric Materials, Russian Academy of Sciences, 70 Profsoyuznaya, 117393 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-1895-9872
Institute of Synthetic Polymeric Materials · RUFrumkin Institute of Physical Chemistry and Electrochemistry · RU

Funding

Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation АААА-А19-119001963-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this review, we summarize recent developments in the field of the mechanochemistry of polymers. The aim of the review is to consider the consequences of mechanical forces and actions on polymers and polymer synthesis. First, we review classical works on chemical reactions and polymerization processes under strong shear deformations. Then, we analyze two emerging directions of research in mechanochemistry-the role of mechanophores and, for the first time, new physical phenomena, accompanying external impulse mechanical actions on polymers. Mechanophores have been recently proposed as sensors of fatigue and cracks in polymers and composites. The effects of the high-pressure pulsed loading of polymers and composites include the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya effect, emission of superradiation and the formation of metal nanoparticles. These effects provide deeper insight into the mechanism of chemical reactions under shear deformations and pave the way for further research in the interests of modern technologies.

Indexed as

anvilsmechanochemistrymechanodestructionmechanophorespolymerizationradicalsradiofrequency superradiancerheological explosion

Identifiers

PMID35160593
PMCPMC8839360
OpenAlexW4210466641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.