Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35160507›Full record

ArticlePolymers2022

Characterization and Functionality of Cellulose from Pomelo Fruitlets by Different Extraction Methods.

Chuanbo He, Hao Li, Jinling Hong, Hejian Xiong, Hui Ni, Mingjing Zheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. KOH-activated carbon from pomelo peels for COEnvironmental science and pollution research international · 2026
    Article
  3. Pre-harvest treatment with gibberellin (GAFood chemistry. Molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Chuanbo HeCollege of Ocean Food and Biological Engineering, Jimei University, Xiamen 361021, China.
Hao LiCollege of Ocean Food and Biological Engineering, Jimei University, Xiamen 361021, China.
Jinling HongCollege of Ocean Food and Biological Engineering, Jimei University, Xiamen 361021, China.
Hejian XiongCollege of Ocean Food and Biological Engineering, Jimei University, Xiamen 361021, China.
Hui NiCollege of Ocean Food and Biological Engineering, Jimei University, Xiamen 361021, China.
Mingjing ZhengCollege of Ocean Food and Biological Engineering, Jimei University, Xiamen 361021, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3791-4976

Funding

Joint Fund of National Natural Science Foundation of China U1805235Regional Development Project of Fujian Province 2019N3012Spark Project of Fujian Province 2020S0043Xiamen Science and Technology Project, China 3502Z20193046
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pomelo fruitlets have the potential for extracting cellulose. This study aimed to investigate characterization and functionality of cellulose extracted from pomelo fruitlets by different extraction methods. Cellulose extracted by acidic-alkaline hydrogen peroxide hydrolysis (CAA), alkaline hydrogen peroxide hydrolysis (CA), and ultrasonic assisted alkaline hydrogen peroxide hydrolysis (CUA) were prepared from pomelo fruitlets. The results showed that cellulose CUA had higher yield and purity with higher crystallinity and smaller particle size than those of CAA or CA (

Indexed as

acid hydrolysisalkaline hydrogen peroxide hydrolysiscellulosepomelo fruitletultrasonication

Identifiers

PMID35160507
PMCPMC8838060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.