Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35160486›Full record

ArticlePolymers2022

The Effect of Openings' Size and Location on Selected Dynamical Properties of Typical Wood Frame Walls.

Marcin Szczepanski, Ahmed Manguri, Najmadeen Saeed, Daniel Chuchala

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Marcin SzczepanskiFaculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Gdansk University of Technology, 80-233 Gdansk, Poland.
Ahmed ManguriFaculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Gdansk University of Technology, 80-233 Gdansk, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-3789-0006
Najmadeen SaeedCivil Engineering Department, University of Raparin, Ranya 46012, Kurdistan Region, Iraq.ORCID 0000-0001-7074-0256
Daniel ChuchalaEkoTech Center, Gdańsk University of Technology, 80-233 Gdańsk, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-6368-6810

Funding

Gdańsk University of Technology under the Hydrogenium Supporting Membership In International Networks-'Excellence Initia-tive-Research University' program DEC-1/2020/IDUB/II.1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The wooden frame constructions are now popular in many developed countries of the world. Many of these locations where such buildings are constructed are exposed to seismic and other shocks which are generated by human activities. This paper discusses the effect of the size and location of openings in the wooden frame walls under dynamic loadings. Natural frequencies of such frames with and without openings have been determined. Three 14 m high walls with different widths, including 3, 6, and 12 m, have been considered. Dynamic analysis has been made using finite element method structural analysis software Dlubal RFEM 5.17. The results show that the effect of the size and location of the openings on the natural frequency is significant. Numerically speaking, the relative change of the natural frequencies of a wall without and with an opening in a specific place could be up to 30%. In addition, the change of the natural frequency for the location of the openings is more sensitive than that to the sizes. Furthermore, the appropriate sizes and locations of openings of the wooden frame walls have been suggested. The appropriate size and place were found to be small openings in the top of the walls.

Indexed as

composite materials in buildingsdynamic loadsnatural frequencyopeningsOSB boardswood-frame

Identifiers

PMID35160486
PMCPMC8838207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.