ReviewPolymers2022
Methods to Characterize Electrospun Scaffold Morphology: A Critical Review.
Review in Polymers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Scalable Ni-Based Diffusion Synthesis of Highly Graphitic Nanointerlaced and Photopatternable Material with Fast Charge Transfer Kinetics.Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids · 2026Article
- Electrospun Quaternary Ammonium Salt-Loaded Nanofibrous Nanocomposites as Wound Dressings.ACS omega · 2026Article
- Hybrid Nanofibers for Multimodal Accelerated Wound Healing.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Article
- Biomimetic electrospun scaffolds for engineered heart tissue: from design parameters to drug testing platforms.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Biodegradable Nanofiber Membranes for Air-Liquid Interface Culture: Advancing AirwayACS omega · 2025Article
- Electrospun Polybenzimidazole Membranes: Fabrication and Fine-Tuning Through Physical and Statistical Approaches.Polymers · 2025Article
- Low-cost gelatin/collagen scaffolds for bacterial growth in bioreactors for biotechnology.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Galectin-3/Gelatin Electrospun Scaffolds Modulate Collagen Synthesis in Skin Healing but Do Not Improve Wound Closure Kinetics.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Stimuli-Responsive Codelivery System-Embedded Polymeric Nanofibers with Synergistic Effects of Growth Factors and Low-Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound to Enhance Osteogenesis Properties.ACS applied bio materials · 2024Article
- Quantitative Evaluation of the Pore and Window Sizes of Tissue Engineering Scaffolds on Scanning Electron Microscope Images Using Deep Learning.ACS omega · 2024Article
- Accelerating the excisional wound closure by using the patterned microstructural nanofibrous mats/gentamicin-loaded hydrogel composite scaffold.Materials today. Bio · 2022Article
- Electrospun Collagen Scaffold Bio-Functionalized with Recombinant ICOS-Fc: An Advanced Approach to Promote Bone Remodelling.Polymers · 2022Article
- Self-Assembly of Ultrafine Fibers with Micropores via Cryogenic Electrospinning and Its Potential Application in Esophagus Repair.Polymers · 2022Article
- Structural Aspects of Electrospun Scaffolds Intended for Prosthetics of Blood Vessels.Polymers · 2022Review
- Electrospun hybrid nanofibers: Fabrication, characterization, and biomedical applications.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Review
- Collagen-hyaluronic acid hydrogel with embedded chondrocytes as a platform for modeling early stages of endochondral ossificationCell transplantationArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Electrospun scaffolds can imitate the hierarchical structures present in the extracellular matrix, representing one of the main concerns of modern tissue engineering. They are characterized in order to evaluate their capability to support cells or to provide guidelines for reproducibility. The issues with widely used methods for morphological characterization are discussed in order to provide insight into a desirable methodology for electrospun scaffold characterization. Reported methods include imaging and physical measurements. Characterization methods harbor inherent limitations and benefits, and these are discussed and presented in a comprehensive selection matrix to provide researchers with the adequate tools and insights required to characterize their electrospun scaffolds. It is shown that imaging methods present the most benefits, with drawbacks being limited to required costs and expertise. By making use of more appropriate characterization, researchers will avoid measurements that do not represent their scaffolds and perhaps might discover that they can extract more characteristics from their scaffold at no further cost.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.