ArticlePolymers2022
An In-Vitro Evaluation of Microleakage in Resin-Based Restorative Materials at Different Time Intervals.
Article in Polymers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of the antibacterial properties of Resin cements with and without the addition of nanoparticles: a systematic review.BMC oral health · 2024Pooled it
- Effect of Additional Surface Conditioning Methods and Adhesive Systems on Microleakage at Composite Repair Interfaces: An in Vitro Study.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Evaluation of cuspal deflection and microleakage of an incrementally packed versus a low shrinkage bulk-fill nanohybrid resin composite: an in-vitro study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Influence of Placement Techniques on Marginal Integrity, Wear Behavior, and Clinical Efficiency of a Bulk-Fill Resin Composite.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- Comparison of microleakage in restorative materials used for deep cervical margin elevation: a systematic review.Biomaterial investigations in dentistry · 2026Review
- Coronal microleakage of two intraorifice bioceramic barriers in single-rooted premolars:Dental research journal · 2026Article
- Influence of thickness and base material in class II restorations with nanofilled composites: finite element study.Frontiers in dental medicine · 2026Article
- Smart biomaterials in restorative dentistry: Recent advances and future perspectives.Materials today. Bio · 2025Review
- AnInternational journal of clinical pediatric dentistry · 2025Article
- Tooth Substrate vs Conventional Materials Used as a Base in Class V Cavities: A Comparative Study.International journal of clinical pediatric dentistry · 2025Article
- Assessing correlation between different temporary restorative materials for microleakage following endodontic treatment: an in-vitro study.BMC oral health · 2024Article
- Evaluating flexure properties, hardness, roughness and microleakage of high-strength injectable dental composite: an in vitro study.BMC oral health · 2024Article
- Aesthetic impact of resin infiltration and its mechanical effect on ceramic bonding for white spot lesions.BMC oral health · 2024Article
- Bacterial adhesion and microleakage of restorative materials for sealing accessory canals in implant prosthesis.Bioinformation · 2024Article
- Microleakage Evaluation of Temporary Restorations Used in Endodontic Treatment-An Ex Vivo Study.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2023Article
- Review
- Mechanical Properties of Orthodontic Cements and Their Behavior in Acidic Environments.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- The Effect of Two Different Light-Curing Units and Curing Times on Bulk-Fill Restorative Materials.Polymers · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 8 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A vital feature of conservative dentistry is the adhesion of the restorative material to the tooth structure for restoration of the tooth substance lost due to dental decay, trauma, or dental imperfections. In a perfect world, a restorative material should generate a lasting adhesion by bonding the restoration with tooth tissues. The ingress of micro-organisms, oral fluids, molecules, and ions through microscopic spaces due to faulty adhesion between restoration and tooth structure is known as microleakage. This study is focuses on the evaluation of adhesive failures between the restorative materials. In the past, studies have focused more on the bonding potential of a restorative material with the tooth surface. Therefore, there is need to carry out a study that compares the microleakage between resin-based restorative materials in a sandwich manner with and without the intermediate bonding layer after immersion in 2% methylene blue dye at different time intervals. The restorative materials used were composite Ceram X Mono plus (DENTSPLY) and Z350 (3M ESPE), Vitremer resin modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) (3M ESPE), smart dentine replacement SDR (3M ESPE), Bond NT (DENTSPLY), and Universal Bond (3M ESPE). A light emitting diode (LED) was used to cure the specimens. Artificial saliva was used as a storage medium for the specimens. Thermocycling of specimens was carried out at 500 cycles/30 s and 1000 cycles/30 s. The world health organization (WHO) grading tool for microleakage was used to analyze fluid ingress in the specimens through disclosing by 2% methylene blue dye. The statistical analysis was carried out with one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey post hoc test, keeping the level of significance at
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.